On 5/25/2017 4:59 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
>
> Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement
> everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I
> know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems
> very resource heavy to load a large exe that require
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ercan Ersoy wrote:
>
> > But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands
> > are yet implemented, it is only like a stub.
>
> Please read README. Also, Minibox includes commands in one executable file.
> (e.g. Busybox)
>
> Command Line
> But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands
> are yet implemented, it is only like a stub.
Please read README. Also, Minibox includes commands in one executable file.
(e.g. Busybox)
Command Line: minibox command [arguments]
> I am curious why it need DPMI and
Thanks.
But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands
are yet implemented, it is only like a stub.
I am curious why it need DPMI and DJGPP for that? It is not enought Watcom C++
in 16 bit real mode?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Hello. I have developed another program for FreeDOS. This program is
Minibox.
Minibox provides some Linux commands for DOS.
Source code compiles by DJGPP. I suggest compressing this for UPX.
Minibox requires DPMI.
Website: https://gitlab.com/ercanersoy/Minibox
Best regards,
Ercan
