Re: [Freedos-devel] Good BASIC interpreter?

2018-07-15 Thread David McMackins
Then I think the strategy should be not to use system() since BASIC should be able to do anything the shell can do internally anyway. Happy Hacking, David E. McMackins II Supporting Member, Electronic Frontier Foundation (#2296972) Associate Member, Free Software Foundation (#12889) www.mcmacki

Re: [Freedos-devel] Good BASIC interpreter?

2018-07-15 Thread Steve Nickolas
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, TK Chia wrote: Regarding bwBASIC's SHELL( ) problem, I believe this is because the interpreter (in bwb_fnc.c in v3.20) uses system( ) to implement it, and both Watcom's system( ) function and `command.com /c' will return 0 as long as command.com is able to run at all. GW

Re: [Freedos-devel] Good BASIC interpreter?

2018-07-15 Thread TK Chia
Hello Mr. McMackins, I guess I am a little late with this --- but I had recently been checking out some existing BASIC implementation projects, and I think there might be a few BASICs which can be ported, with some effort. For example there is the "Minimal BASIC Compiler" (http://buraphakit.