Hi Tom,
the big one is built with xms-swap, yours without. I get 82758 also
without xms-swap.
So it looks like something in the swap code is still buggy then ...
Bart
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On 10/23/2018 2:05 PM, Robert Riebisch wrote:
Hi Ralf,
barts freecom has length 84756
myfreecom has length 82758 (without UPX)
should this not be identical?
One would expect so. But a two byte difference, and the bug in one
Not two bytes: 84756 - 82758 = 1998 bytes
Cheers
Robert
Hi Ralf,
>> barts freecom has length 84756
>> myfreecom has length 82758 (without UPX)
>>
>> should this not be identical?
> One would expect so. But a two byte difference, and the bug in one
Not two bytes: 84756 - 82758 = 1998 bytes
Cheers
Robert
--
+++ BTTR Software +++
On 10/23/2018 6:05 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote:
now things become strange.
I tried to reproduce and fix the bugs reported on oct 19.
when I replace freecomW as compiled by Bart by a
watcom compiled by me, the bugs vanish.
compiled by wcc 1.9
barts freecom has length 84756
myfreecom has length
Hi Tom,
> when I replace freecomW as compiled by Bart by a
> watcom compiled by me, the bugs vanish.
> compiled by wcc 1.9
> barts freecom has length 84756
> myfreecom has length 82758 (without UPX)
> should this not be identical?
yes they should be identical, as I also used wcc 1.9. I'll
now things become strange.
I tried to reproduce and fix the bugs reported on oct 19.
when I replace freecomW as compiled by Bart by a
watcom compiled by me, the bugs vanish.
compiled by wcc 1.9
barts freecom has length 84756
myfreecom has length 82758 (without UPX)
should this not be
