Hi Bret,
> In general, I find that toggling options are a bad idea. Things just
> get too confusing, especially if you have multiple "sources" for the
> options (like combinations of internal/compile-time default settings,
> environment variables, options entered through a batch file, options
> en
> In general, I find that toggling options are a bad idea. Things
> just get too confusing, especially if you have multiple "sources"
> for the options (like combinations of internal/compile-time default
> settings, environment variables, options entered through a batch
> file, options entered v
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022, tom ehlert wrote:
maybe even one of our assembler gurus looks at published sources of
msdos 2.01
The 2.11 sources won't say anything here, as the DIRCMD stuff wasn't
introduced to MS-DOS until 5.0.
I checked the behavior with PC DOS 2000 since that was my preferred
ver
I have uploaded some of the main files from FTP and the site at
http://rs1.szif.hu/~tomcat/win32/ here:
http://master.dl.sourceforge.net/project/win32nasm-cache/Win32NASM__60c5ed87f2e79d6259e9b2846049e051..7z?viasf=1
- Forwarded Message - From: Mathi To: Samuel
V. Cc: mathimaa...@y
