> Am 28.08.2025 um 01:11 schrieb E. Auer via Freedos-devel
> :
>
> Would the APACKed file also work on 8086?
While not having tested this specific HTMLHELP binary, a FDISK binary I tested
with the same APACK version did (though the official FDISK binary is UPX
compressed).
> Does HTMLHELP i
Hi,
El jue, 28 ago 2025 a las 1:12, E. Auer via Freedos-devel (<
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>) escribió:
> I tend to stick to UPX, preferably the UPX-UCL variant.
>
>
+1 for that.
As for me, I prefer to stick with the open source solution (and to my
taste, even better when it is MIT/BSD-t
Hi,
after fixing a memory corruption in HTMLHELP [1], I need to publish a new
binary. I noticed that the APACK [2] compressed file is 53067 bytes, while the
UPX compressed file is 55292 bytes, so ~4% better compression when using APACK.
UPX 5.02 settings : --8086 --best
APACK 1.00 settings: -1
Hi Bernd!
after fixing a memory corruption in HTMLHELP [1],
"The memory corruption happened in openZipFile() by overwriting
data segment elements following zipfile, especially the UTF conversion
tables. zipfile stores an absolute path, so it was changed to
zipfile[MAXPATH] instead zipfile[MA
