Re: [Freedos-devel] More weird behavior trying to boot USB sticks

2006-03-04 Thread aitorsm
Hi, >> the FreeDOS "DIR" command doesn't show the size of the drive if there >> are no files on it, so I have to be very careful in checking A:. > > Is this a FreeCOM bug? anyone? I don't have resources handy for test MS-DOS behaviour, but if it is, please do fill a bugzilla entry to keep track o

Re: [Freedos-devel] Wiki spam

2006-01-06 Thread aitorsm
Hi Michael, I have seen that too (from the "recent changes"). It has always surprised and annoyed me such things a lot, because who can think they can sell by spamming a wiki documenting some software? This sort of things can only generate anger, thus it has been done because of a very malicious (

[Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD-KEYB 2.0 pre-release 4

2006-01-06 Thread aitorsm
Hi all, I hereby announce the new version of KEYB, FD-KEYB 2.0 pre-release 4, a major bugfix release since the previous version. You can get it at ibiblio as usual: BINARY: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/keyb/kb2pre4x.zip SOURCE: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-st

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0

2005-12-25 Thread aitorsm
>> > errors). Thus LFN support should not be mandatory, in fact we >> > may want to offer support for it as a second binary (eg tree v3.x >> > is intended for older systems or spaced limited ones, whereas >> > pdtree (tree v4.x) supports LFNs (and additional items on NT systems >> > such as indica

Re: [Freedos-devel] Analyzing bugzilla bugs (part 1/3)

2005-12-03 Thread aitorsm
Hi, tom ehlert escribió: > Hello Kenneth, > > >>1849, > >> not strictly a FreeCom bug > > > right Ok, thanks for both. I just had a listing purpose and had a quick look to them, not digging into details so thanks to both. Aitor --- This

[Freedos-devel] Analyzing bugzilla (part 3/3), the bugs...

2005-12-03 Thread aitorsm
Hi there, So here it comes the third and last list: the bugs, those bugs that I believe to be active in current versions and not working. There's a big variety, for some of me show to me that it may be a bit (even if a little bit) not ready for FreeDOS 1.0. My intention would be, if possible, to t