Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS limits! and FDNPKG v0.93a released

2013-02-22 Thread escape
On 22.02.13 03:22, Rugxulo wrote: > > If you just want 64-bit support *and* DOS support (but not necessarily > in the same program, which would be hard, if not "almost" impossible), > your best bet would be DOSEMU (x64) or VirtualBox with latest (Nehalem > Westmere-ish) hardware cpu VT-X support

Re: [Freedos-devel] Bloček and Kašmár Improvements

2012-08-14 Thread escape
On 14.08.12 11:23, Tae Wong wrote: > There are keyboard naming errors in Bloček... > > The Russian keyboard name must not be Русская. It should be Русский. > It can't be directly translated from English and depends on context. While Russian (language) is translated as Русский (язык), Russian (ke

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.1 released

2012-01-04 Thread escape
And now on slashdot: http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/01/04/177236/freedos-11-released On 04.01.12 00:39, James Hall wrote: > I'm collecting news items for our "FreeDOS in the news" page. Let me > know if you see more coverage: > http://www.freedos.org/freedos/news/ > > -jh > > > > On Tue, Ja

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.1 released

2012-01-04 Thread escape
Announce on Russian sites dedicated to free and open source software caused a lot of discussion: http://www.opennet.ru/opennews/art.shtml?num=32720 http://www.linux.org.ru/news/opensource/7213522 On 04.01.12 00:39, James Hall wrote: > I'm collecting news items for our "FreeDOS in the news" page. L

Re: [Freedos-devel] Rufus/FreeDOS KB locale

2012-01-04 Thread escape
Is there any chance to see Rufus under Linux? On 04.01.12 03:38, Pete Batard wrote: > Well, considering that Microsoft has declared EOL for Win2k/NT/Me/98/95 > and more importantly, considering that MinGW, which is currently used to > produce the binary version of Rufus, no longer offers guarant