Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.1

2011-12-18 Thread Decheng Fan
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Bernd Blaauw wrote: > Op 15-12-2011 18:33, Mark Brown schreef: > >> > As for other news, how is Freedos 1.1 coming along? > > > >>Do you need it badly? > > yes! > > will anyone please send me a copy of it? > > It will be published when done, likely just before Chr

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.1

2011-12-15 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 15-12-2011 18:33, Mark Brown schreef: >> > As for other news, how is Freedos 1.1 coming along? > >>Do you need it badly? > yes! > will anyone please send me a copy of it? It will be published when done, likely just before Christmas. Current binary release is about 16MB but I'll have to add sour

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-user] Freedos 1.1 status

2008-09-02 Thread Travis Siegel
I have contacted the author of provox, and he has given his permission to include provox in freedos. I've also run it under freedos, and it works perfectly. It's likely the code could use some tweaking to make it work better, but it does ork as is. Currently, folks will need an external synthes

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-user] Freedos 1.1 status

2008-09-02 Thread Aitor SantamarĂ­a
Hello, 2008/8/29, Travis Siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Speaking of freedos 1.1. > I know freedos isn't intended to be dos *exactly* but it is intended > to be a free dos replacement. > This is fine for those using emulators under other operating systems, > and those who can see their screens. > Ho