Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO(#3)released

2011-08-03 Thread cm
> http://www.bttr-software.de/products/drvexch/ I guess, written by you > or one of the other BTTR regulars? :) > > I think it has a safeguard against C: though due to often-valid > assumption that people actually boot from C: > > Perhaps Robert Riebisch knows more about the program as he hosts it

Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO (#3)released

2011-08-03 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 4-8-2011 1:00, c...@bttr-software.de schreef: > So a program could be written which would determine what drive DOS was > booted from, and which would then make that drive disappear (or move it > elsewhere). Afterwards, it could move all following drives "down" to fill > the gap. For example, if

Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO (#3)released

2011-08-03 Thread cm
> Just wanted to add to the above by saying it would be awesome if a > semi-full USB stack would exist. Basicly: recognise USB equipment > whenever not booting from it. The problem generally preventing drivers from doing that is that, first, taking over the controllers disables any BIOS compatibil

Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO (#3) released

2011-08-03 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 3-8-2011 23:41, Bernd Blaauw schreef: > As for your drivers, I'm rather curious. Suppose I boot an USB flash > disk (2.0 interface, 2.0 port), and crappy BIOS is happy to stick to 1.1 > speed. The flash disk gets assigned C:. > Next, I'd load your drivers, which > 1) disable all BIOS legacy USB

Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO (#3) released

2011-07-28 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 28-7-2011 21:20, Bernd Blaauw schreef: > Op 28-7-2011 4:30, Jim Michaels schreef: >> and cdrtools for dos? Hm time to remind those Mozilla Thunderbird developers about removing subject spam tag in responses and original if someone responds + sends. I've got no intention of clicking every messa