On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:14 +, Bart Oldeman wrote:
> On 11/13/06, Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rex Conn wrote:
> > > > > The only restrictions I'd put on the source code is that it not be
> > > > > used for
> > > > > an OS other than FreeDOS or any commercial products without my
>
Hi!
13-Ноя-2006 19:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC> Hi. Not to be a party pooper, but why not use OW + _WASM_ as WASM is
BC> closer to MASM than NASM...
WASM is non-separated, (almost) non-maintained product, with floating
properties,
On 11/13/06, Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rex Conn wrote:
> > > > The only restrictions I'd put on the source code is that it not be used
> > > > for
> > > > an OS other than FreeDOS or any commercial products without my
> > > > permission.
This is a somewhat nasty term that makes it not
Kudos to Rex Conn and JP Software!
4DOS was always the program that made running MS DOS tolerable. The feature I
most liked was the ability to use page-up to work back through pages of previous
commands until I reached the one I needed - I wish bash had such a feature -
ctrl-r doesn't work as wel
Hi. Not to be a party pooper, but why not use OW + _WASM_ as WASM is
closer to MASM than NASM...
On 11/13/06, Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are like me, you have used (or are using) the 4DOS command shell.
> 4DOS was my favorite DOS app. Back in the day, my DOS development
> syste
If you are like me, you have used (or are using) the 4DOS command shell.
4DOS was my favorite DOS app. Back in the day, my DOS development
system was guaranteed to have at least one C compiler, a cool editor for
writing code, and a copy of 4DOS to make the command line easier to use.
I still run a
