Re: [Freedos-devel] Analysing KITTENC

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, 6:46 PM Aitor Santamaría wrote: > Hello Jeremy, > > ... > > Thus sprintf and processEscChars differ in behaviour (although for this > "buggy" string definition). I suppose that this new function > (processEscChars) is added to avoid problems with the % symbol... > > Aitor >

Re: [Freedos-devel] Analysing KITTENC

Hello Jeremy, In this case (strtoul), the code always assumes the \xdd has only two numeric characters, i.e. a byte. I suppose that makes sense for DOS compilers (although the limitation doesn't seem to exist in general: Escape sequences in C - Wikipedia

Re: [Freedos-devel] Analysing KITTENC

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 4:48 PM Aitor Santamaría wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks Jeremy. > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 13:03, wrote: >> >> > I was trying to figure out how KITTEN/KITTENC works. Seems to attach each >> > NLS file with the "KITTENC" signal by the end of the executable. I've read >> > abou

Re: [Freedos-devel] Analysing KITTENC

Hi, Thanks Jeremy. On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 13:03, wrote: > > I was trying to figure out how KITTEN/KITTENC works. Seems to attach > each NLS file with the "KITTENC" signal by the end of the executable. I've > read about making UPX support easier, I guess you UPX before you ATTACH. > > It is writ

Re: [Freedos-devel] Analysing KITTENC

This is my understanding from reading the code a few days ago: On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:32 AM Aitor Santamaría wrote: > > Hello, > > Sorry about the SPAM. I found the older thread too long, so I'm starting a > new one with the same content (please comment here if you want to ). > > I was trying

[Freedos-devel] Analysing KITTENC

Hello, Sorry about the SPAM. I found the older thread too long, so I'm starting a new one with the same content (please comment here if you want to ). I was trying to figure out how KITTEN/KITTENC works. Seems to attach each NLS file with the "KITTENC" signal by the end of the executable. I've re