Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility Issue - etherdfs, shsucdx, freedos kernel?

2021-08-26 Thread Jerome Shidel
Hi Eric and all, I ran a couple more tests. With MSCDEX under FreeDOS and SHSUCDX under MSDOS. Both showed Drive X: using INT 2F,1500. Went back to just FreeDOS and SHSUCDX, and it showed INT 2F,1500. Basically, then played with some config settings until I got to this point…. When SHSUCDX /

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility Issue - etherdfs, shsucdx, freedos kernel?

2021-08-26 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Jerome, > First under MS-DOS, INT 21 Function 4408, reports “error 1, Invalid function > number” > for drive N & X. But for those drives, FreeDOS reports “error 15, Invalid > drive” That would be in DosDevIOctl() in the kernel, command C_REMMEDIA, which seems to be missing in the kernel imp

[Freedos-devel] Compatibility Issue

2021-08-26 Thread Jerome Shidel
Hi everyone, I’ve noticed that a couple of my ancient programs (and some stuff by other developers) reject a couple drives as being “invalid” under FreeDOS when no problem occurs under other DOS platforms like MS & PC-DOS. Namely, a mounted share using EtherDFS and the CD-ROM drive. So, I start