ah!! i would like to report a bug~
upgrading packages with fdnpkg will not succeed ^^;
especially upgrading itself~
^^;
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FDNPKG-design-issues-tp24281p24409.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ah~~ i am so sorry!! i did not know!! ^^;
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FDNPKG-design-issues-tp24281p24408.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
S
I'm not sure you noticed, but I already ported most of FDNPKG to 16bits
a few months ago - it's called FDINST. No network though, nor repository
support, nor LZMA.
Mateusz
On 27/01/2016 19:07, sparky4 wrote:
> ok i was able to compile FDNPKG16 port... not for the difficult part
> fixing it
ok i was able to compile FDNPKG16 port... not for the difficult part
fixing it and making it minimal!!
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FDNPKG-design-issues-tp24281p24401.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
wel it comes with it's libs included in the source...
the code is not so portable to 16 bit...
due to dependencies on libraries and 32 bit compilers
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FDNPKG-design-issues-tp24281p24307.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing
whoa!! congradulations on a child ^^
i had a dev friend who had a child too~
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FDNPKG-design-issues-tp24281p24306.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Antony Gordon wrote:
>
> Since I'm on baby ALERT (my wife is due soon) and I'm not working as much,
> I'll take a look.
I know this is a bit simplistic to say, but ... congrats, mazel tov, etc. :-)
--
Hi,
Zip is the default format right? What kind of zip library is being used?
The program should assume that networking is configured and operational and
should only have to establish connections in my opinion.
Since I'm on baby ALERT (my wife is due soon) and I'm not working as much,
I'll take a
anyone?? think that a more segmented design would be better?
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FDNPKG-design-issues-tp24281p24300.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
I personally think there is too much embedded code in fdnpkg.exe
this makes it very difficult for the transition to 16 bit fdnpkg16
there should be external commands for the compression and networking
functions in fdnpkg
^^;
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com
also what code and libraries in FDNPKG is needed from the repository for
compiling?
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FDNPKG-design-issues-tp24281p24282.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
