> Am 10.06.2025 um 23:13 schrieb tom ehlert via Freedos-devel
> :
>
> Not FD CHKDSK? For a reason? FAT32?
The reason is that it was already on my disk and is WAY faster than CHKDSK. But
FD CHKDSK reports equivalent errors. Setting BUFFERS=1 has no effect on the
bug. I also checked with the p
Hi Tom,
> On Jun 10, 2025, at 5:13 PM, tom ehlert via Freedos-devel
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some comments.
>
> First, I find it absolutely remarkable that the combination of FreeDOS kernel
> and DOSLFN went without
> reported problems for 20+ years. So much for 'testing' by installing ...
>
>>>
I could be misremembering things, as it's been a long time since I've run the
MS flavor of DOS on any of my systems, but I seem to remember this being kind
of a known issue back in the day with MS Scandisk, in that you were not to use
it if you also used LFNs on your file system. Since it was ma
Hi,
some comments.
First, I find it absolutely remarkable that the combination of FreeDOS kernel
and DOSLFN went without
reported problems for 20+ years. So much for 'testing' by installing ...
>> Am 10.06.2025 um 14:19 schrieb Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel
>> :
>>
>> When installing the A
Hi,
> Am 10.06.2025 um 14:19 schrieb Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel
> :
>
> When installing the ADT2 package[1] from the repository at FD.LOD.BZ using
> FDNPKG, it would install the 999 files in the package. However, the
> FREEDOS\PACKAGES\ADT2.LST file would only contain about 300 entries.
Hi All,
A few days ago, Willi discovered an odd File Name related bug.
When installing the ADT2 package[1] from the repository at FD.LOD.BZ using
FDNPKG, it would install the 999 files in the package. However, the
FREEDOS\PACKAGES\ADT2.LST file would only contain about 300 entries.
Uninstallin
