Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 2.0

2015-06-08 Thread Antony Gordon
If there were only retail copies of FreeDOS. On Fri, May 29, 2015, 10:25 AM JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU wrote: > If only there was a holographic FreeDOS (Like for the Samsung SMart > window,or Microsoft's hololense).If there was a holographic FreeDOS,I would > throw a party.(Think how cool that would be!

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 2.0

2015-05-29 Thread JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
If only there was a holographic FreeDOS (Like for the Samsung SMart window,or Microsoft's hololense).If there was a holographic FreeDOS,I would throw a party.(Think how cool that would be!). On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: > Correction... FreeDOS 1.2. Not 2.0. > > On Th

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 2.0

2015-05-28 Thread Mercury Thirteen
Correction... FreeDOS 1.2. Not 2.0. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Antony Gordon wrote: > Hi, > > If I were building the FreeDOS distribution, the only thing that would be > included as a part of the official FreeDOS install would be the components > that make up the OS depending on the MS/PC

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 2.0

2015-05-28 Thread Antony Gordon
Hi, If I were building the FreeDOS distribution, the only thing that would be included as a part of the official FreeDOS install would be the components that make up the OS depending on the MS/PC DOS version distribution we wanted to emulate. I would also supply these files as one complete ZIP

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 2.0

2015-05-28 Thread J.K. Benedict
I agree to exclude it. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network. From: Mercury Thirteen Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 15:52 To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Reply To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers. Subject: [Freedos-devel

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 2.0

2015-05-28 Thread Mercury Thirteen
Although it is freeware, source code for NDN appears to be unavailable. Given this project's push towards 100% open software, I am inclined to exclude it from the FreeDOS 2.0 image. Any thoughts? -- ___