Hi, I would say fdpkg is the more complete package
management frontend, so if you want to modify one
to make the other obsolete, you should instead add
fdupdate functionality to fdpkg ;-). But for me, it
is fine to have both fdpkg and fdupdate. The latter
could make more use of fdpkg, that would m
Hi,
i would suggest to extend fdupdate as freedos main pkg front end
all we need to do is add the possibility to create local repos
i mean, be able to use cd, floppy or whatever as a repo :)
and of course still use fdpkg and back end...
Geraldo
Sapere Aude
Non ducor, duco
São Paulo, Brasil, -3gm
Hi guys!
How are you doing there?
First of all, if we do not exchange emails in the mean time i really
wish to you all a great merry christmas/new year time! :)
Folks, i think it is fine to get the list of software to update and
repack it for fd 1.1
and count on me for this but i would prefer to
Hi Geraldo!
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Geraldo Netto wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> How are you doing there?
>
> First of all, if we do not exchange emails in the mean time i really
> wish to you all a great merry christmas/new year time! :)
Merry Christmas to you too, all of you!
http://www.freedo
Hi everybody :-)
First a correction about help.fdos.org - it does render
okay in firefox, it is only outdated. Reason for the
failure to display was a firefox update running exactly
at the same moment... ;-).
> wish to you all a great merry christmas/new year time! :)
Thanks, same to you :-)
