Hello,
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 22:28, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> > I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT
> >
> https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip
> > is incomplete as it assumes an existing DFLAT library which is not
> >
tom ehlert [22/04/2022 14.31]:
Can you complete the build with this?
https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/libs/dflat/
no. this is linux stuff with unknown conversion status.
won't touch.
How is this Linux stuff? This is the _readme.txt_ file from that directory:
Hi Tom,
I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT
https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip
is incomplete as it assumes an existing DFLAT library which is not
included, and at least non-trivil to locate on the internet.
Looking at my
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 7:34 AM tom ehlert wrote:
> > I think in the FreeDOS "beta" days, the distributions included
> > programming libraries too, basically a copy of the "libs" tree from
> > Ibiblio.
> what "libs" tree?
>
This link, one level up from the DFLAT link I shared in my other email:
Hallo Herr Jim Hall,
am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 11:57 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 4:22 AM tom ehlert wrote:
> I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT
> https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip
> is incomplete as
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 4:22 AM tom ehlert wrote:
>
> I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT
>
> https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip
> is incomplete as it assumes an existing DFLAT library which is not
> included, and at least
I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT
https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip
is incomplete as it assumes an existing DFLAT library which is not
included, and at least non-trivil to locate on the internet.
Tom
