>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Ladislav Lacina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: zondag, maart 16, 2008 07:31 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] How to create alternative shell
>
>> Well, I wouldn't say t
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Ladislav Lacina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: zondag, maart 16, 2008 07:31 PM
>Aan: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Onderwerp: Re: [Freedos-devel] How to create alternative shell
>
>> Well, I wouldn't say t
> Well, I wouldn't say that it would never be done. I actually have been
thinking heavily on porting mono to FreeDOS. But I am first working on some
other stuff first (like a real implementation of the LEAN file system in C).
Nice to hear it. However I think the most important is now a decent FAT3
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>What programming language you use is entirely up to you - though I doubt that
>Java or C# are available on any current or previous MS/PC/DR-DOS clone, and I
>doubt that anyone will provide them for it either.
Well, I wouldn't say that it would never be done
Some time ago I spent some time thinking about shells...
One approach that solves more problems is:
1) a .BAT allocates some environment variable with a lot of space, like
NEXTCMD=1234567890123456789012345678901234567(127chars)
2) the .BAT calls a program that can be written in any language, an
Some added comments...
> Secondly, if you know about BNF, lex and yacc
Those are about parsing. In other words, they are about how
you decide what a STRING like "copy *.txt *.com x: /z" wants
to TELL your shell ;-).
> What programming language you use is entirely up to you - though I doubt that
First things first - what is it going to be doing? Is it a small and quick
drop-in for command.com? Or a heavyweight replacement that does a lot more
things that command.com couldn't do? Decide that first.
Secondly, if you know about BNF, lex and yacc, it might be a good idea to do a
lot of
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Marco Achury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a newby question.
> I would like to write an alternative interpreter command to replace
> command.com/Freecom.
I don't think that this is as easy as it seems. If you don't want
your shell to waste tons of low memory
Eric Auer escreveu:
> Hi Marco,
>
>> I would like to write an alternative interpreter command
>> to replace command.com/Freecom.
>
> That can be as easy or as hard as you want.
You can even have a completely normal program that you run whenever you
want and "behaves" like a command com. That i
Hi Marco,
> I would like to write an alternative interpreter command
> to replace command.com/Freecom.
That can be as easy or as hard as you want.
> I have basic programming knowledge.
Good.
> I'm clear that I must to provide a replacement
> for all internal commands.
No. Almost any program
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Marco Achury wrote:
> Just a newby question.
> I would like to write an alternative interpreter command to replace
> command.com/Freecom.
> I have basic programming knowledge.
> I'm clear that I must to provide a replacement for all internal commands.
> Can I simply write my
Just a newby question.
I would like to write an alternative interpreter command to replace
command.com/Freecom.
I have basic programming knowledge.
I'm clear that I must to provide a replacement for all internal commands.
Can I simply write my program in my favorite language, compile as stand
alo
12 matches
Mail list logo
