This is in regard to referring to "leaked" M$-DOS v6 source code.
Richard Stallman wrote in the GNU Coding Standards:
Don't in any circumstances refer to Unix source code for or during your
work on GNU! (Or to any other proprietary programs.)
If you have a vague recollection of the internals o
At Tue, 17 Feb 2004 3:13pm +0200, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:32:27 -0600, Jim Hall wrote:
>
> > We've actually addressed this issue before. Some years ago, the
> > source code to MS-DOS was leaked. For a while, I would get about an
> > email a week from people (who probab
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:32:27 -0600, Jim Hall wrote:
We've actually addressed this issue before. Some years ago, the source code to MS-DOS was leaked. For a while, I would get about an email a week from people (who probably thought they were being helpful) asking if I wanted access to the Microso
I hope I don't start a flame war on this.
Thought I'd fwd this note that I found on the Groklaw site, usually a
good resource for legal issues dealing with Free and Open Source Software.
You've probably all seen by now that (part of) the source code to
Microsoft's WindowsNT and Windows2000 has
