Hi!
28-Май-2004 12:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> +++ device.h 28 May 2004 12:57:25 - 1.22
> @@ -366,6 +366,19 @@
> +struct {
> + UBYTE _r_cat; /* Category code */
> + UBYTE _r_fun; /* Function code */
struct
On Sat, 29 May 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> > +++ ioctl.c 28 May 2004 12:57:41 - 1.30
> > @@ -59,13 +59,25 @@
> > + /* commonly used, shouldn't harm to do front up */
> > + if (al == 0x0C || al == 0x0D || al >= 0x10) /* generic or query */
> > + {
> > +CharReqHdr.r_cat = r->C
Hi!
28-Май-2004 23:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> > +++ ioctl.c 28 May 2004 12:57:41 - 1.30
>> > @@ -59,13 +59,25 @@
>> > + /* commonly used, shouldn't harm to do front up */
>> > + if (al == 0x0C || al == 0x0D || al >= 0x10) /* generic or query */
On Sat, 29 May 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> No, all right: r_catfun is a xreg.x and r_cat is a xreg.h. Mistake is
> in my comment: I was should say "difference is that r_cat comes _after_
> r_fun to make consistent with CX".
No, it can't be. See Table 02597 in RBIL at int2f/ax=0802,
---c
