Re: [Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-17 Thread Johnson Lam
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:08:17 -0200, you wrote: Hi Alain, Link below: http://www.geocities.com/freedos_pg >If so many people in FreeDOS are interested, I would like to know about ;-) The problem is PG 1.08 didn't come with binary. At first I think PG's maintainer BAHCL forgot to put the binary

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-17 Thread Steve Nickolas
At Mon, 16 Feb 2004 4:08pm -0200, Alain wrote: > HI, > > I have a BIG question: What is PG? I just searched the site, followed > every link and could not find any explanation, it only says how it can > solve "many" PC problems, not even specifying which... > > If so many people in FreeDOS are in

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-17 Thread Alain
HI, I have a BIG question: What is PG? I just searched the site, followed every link and could not find any explanation, it only says how it can solve "many" PC problems, not even specifying which... If so many people in FreeDOS are interested, I would like to know about ;-) Alain --

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-16 Thread Luchezar Georgiev
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:12:19 -0600, Jim Hall wrote: Indeed, I can't understand why he doesn't want to include binaries? Well, I've sometimes done that in the past, too, so I can't be too critical of BAHCL. Binaries aren't strictly required by the GNU GPL, and if web space is a problem, I can unde

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-16 Thread Jim Hall
Luchezar Georgiev wrote: Hi, This "written offer" requirement is really scaring indeed. Does the GPL say that it must be signed and stamped by a notary? Or passed through the United Nations Security Council? ;-) Just joking, of course - please don't take the above sentences seriously! :-) BTW,

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-16 Thread Luchezar Georgiev
Hi, This "written offer" requirement is really scaring indeed. Does the GPL say that it must be signed and stamped by a notary? Or passed through the United Nations Security Council? ;-) Just joking, of course - please don't take the above sentences seriously! But including the source with the b

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-16 Thread Jim Hall
> --- Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> > > >>Eric. >> >>PS: I would like to have some PG binaries online, >>too. If nobody else wants >>to provide some, I could do so, but I am not sure if >>BAHCL is okay with this!? >> This is okay under the GNU GPL, provided the PG binaries are distributed in

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-16 Thread maintainer freedospg
--- tom ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容:> Hello maintainer, > > >> PS: I would like to have some PG binaries online, > >> too. If nobody else wants > >> to provide some, I could do so, but I am not sure > if > >> BAHCL is okay with this!? > >> > > mf> those PG binaries will be covered by the G

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-16 Thread tom ehlert
Hello maintainer, >> PS: I would like to have some PG binaries online, >> too. If nobody else wants >> to provide some, I could do so, but I am not sure if >> BAHCL is okay with this!? >> mf> those PG binaries will be covered by the GNU GPL mf> version 2, and will have a link to the PG website.

[Freedos-devel] Re:Eric's idea to put "PG binaries online"

2004-02-15 Thread maintainer freedospg
--- Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> > Eric. > > PS: I would like to have some PG binaries online, > too. If nobody else wants > to provide some, I could do so, but I am not sure if > BAHCL is okay with this!? > Hi Eric, It's okay, go ahead. The only thing I want to be sure if those PG binari