Re: [Freedos-devel] Slowdown-Units ratings and a CPU-bound depacker be nchmark

2023-04-12 Thread Bret Johnson
> However, the topic of port I/O and MMIO reminds me of some activity > by RayeR and others regarding low-level configuration to speed up > access to PCI / PCIe graphics in DOS. I think the issue was that no > fast defaults were applied by the BIOS, slowing down VESA LFB a lot. Video is kind of a

Re: [Freedos-devel] Slowdown-Units ratings and a CPU-bound depacker be nchmark

2023-04-06 Thread Bret Johnson
>> I tried posting a much longer response to this, but it was >> apparently rejected by the moderators. Here's a shorter one. > As I already mentioned in the other reply to this thread, feel free > to send me more specific replies to that article. I'm not sure why it didn't get posted -- it got

Re: [Freedos-devel] Slowdown-Units ratings and a CPU-bound depacker be nchmark

2023-04-05 Thread C. Masloch
On at 2023-04-05 03:32 +, Bret Johnson wrote: The article is found at https://pushbx.org/ecm/dokuwiki /doku.php?id=blog:pushbx:2023:0321_cpu_performance_comparison I mostly agree with you and your article, but: fine that you agree, but at most 50% of the article is even close to 'right'.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Slowdown-Units ratings and a CPU-bound depacker be nchmark

2023-04-05 Thread C. Masloch
On at 2023-04-04 21:09 +0200, tom ehlert wrote: Dear Bret, The article is found at https://pushbx.org/ecm/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=blog:pushbx:2023:0321_cpu_performance_comparison I mostly agree with you and your article, but: fine that you agree, but at most 50% of the article is even close

Re: [Freedos-devel] Slowdown-Units ratings and a CPU-bound depacker be nchmark

2023-04-04 Thread Bret Johnson
>>> The article is found at >>> https://pushbx.org/ecm/dokuwiki >>> /doku.php?id=blog:pushbx:2023:0321_cpu_performance_comparison >> >> I mostly agree with you and your article, but: > > fine that you agree, but at most 50% of the article is even close to > 'right'. You're the one who said, "I mo

Re: [Freedos-devel] Slowdown-Units ratings and a CPU-bound depacker be nchmark

2023-04-04 Thread tom ehlert
Dear Bret, > The article is found at >> https://pushbx.org/ecm/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=blog:pushbx:2023:0321_cpu_performance_comparison > I mostly agree with you and your article, but: fine that you agree, but at most 50% of the article is even close to 'right'. >>> Conclusion >>> >>> CPU-bound

Re: [Freedos-devel] Slowdown-Units ratings and a CPU-bound depacker be nchmark

2023-04-04 Thread Bret Johnson
Hi, am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 23:26 schrieben Sie: > Hello! The article is found at > https://pushbx.org/ecm/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=blog:pushbx:2023:0321_cpu_performance_comparison I mostly agree with you and your article, but: >> Conclusion >> >> CPU-bound benchmarks are much faster on a