Erwin Veermans wrote:
P.S. Using 2.0 UDMA2.SYS /L /S with UMBPCI.SYS 2.63
I think you mean UMBPCI 3.63. ;-)
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get
Hi!
9--2005 18:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Berger) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
I would like to compile a list of motherboards/chipsets, according to
these criteria:
GOOD:
UDMA loads and accelerates everything as advertised
HARMLESS:
UDMA loads, detects some error and
Hello everybody,
I had contact with Jack Ellis, and he claims that there are NO systems
(that he knows about), where UDMA leaves it in a unusable state.
maybe it won't work(accelerate), but at least it doesn't break the system.
So UDMA could be used as default driver on ANY system.
are there ANY
tom ehlert wrote:
approximate age
What age? CPU, Mainboard, HDD, ...?
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition
Hi!
9--2005 16:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to tom ehlert
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
te I forgot to mention
Where?
te one VERY important thing: what information to provide.
For what?
te please send
tedevice- and vendor ID as reported by UDMA
UDMA - as
Arkady V.Belousov schreef:
Hi!
Where?
in a previous message. Tom wants to collect results about UDMA2.SYS
compatibility. It's a driver to set IDE devices (not ATAPI, only IDE)
from PIO into UDMA mode.
Result will be usefull for his own software (partition imaging product),
but also for
Thank you Bernd for steering this good effort by Tom
away from semantics and back on track.
@Tom
I will send you any info on non-working hardware I
get from my NwDsk end-users. Since I provide an
escape-option in config.sys to choose when
experiencing errors like this, the response might
be low
Hello Erwin,
@Tom
I will send you any info on non-working hardware I
get from my NwDsk end-users. Since I provide an
escape-option in config.sys to choose when
experiencing errors like this, the response might
be low due to end-users successfully using this
workaround.
I plan something
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 14:33 +0100, tom ehlert wrote:
SNIP
I would like to compile a list of motherboards/chipsets, according to
these criteria:
GOOD:
UDMA loads and accelerates everything as advertised
HARMLESS:
UDMA loads, detects some error and unloads, but the system remains
Hi everybody
Happy new year first.
I want to ask the general audience about UDMA(2)'s compatibility with
chipsets. UDMA will accelerate many/most of current chipsets, but
unfortunately it seems to kill some (few?) chipsets and mustn't be
used on those.
unfortunately the 'sometimes bad' makes it
I forgot to mention one VERY important thing: what information to
provide.
please send
device- and vendor ID as reported by UDMA
AMD/Intel CPU
approximate age
and - of course - GOOD, BAD, HARMLESS
tom
---
The SF.Net email is
tom ehlert wrote:
I forgot to mention one VERY important thing: what information to
provide.
please send
device- and vendor ID as reported by UDMA
AMD/Intel CPU
approximate age
and - of course - GOOD, BAD, HARMLESS
tom
It would be interesting to see how the behavior changes in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
