Re: [Freedos-devel] UPX/UCL Hell

2004-03-22 Thread Luchezar Georgiev
Hola Aitor! I'd like to ask if someone has successfully compiled UPX/UCL. I did this last year with DJGPP 3.02, and could try UPX 1.91 with DJGPP 3.33, but I don't think it's worth! See my post at http://upx.sourceforge.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=255 (quoted below). Lucho Posted: Wed May 14, 20

Re: [Freedos-devel] UPX/UCL Hell

2004-03-22 Thread Alain
Hi tom, IFF it's ok to compile a GPL program with any compiler of your choice, and distribute it, The problem is not the compiler but the library. On clear example is (in Linux) if you use GCC/GPP you can make a comercial program, but you cannot include it's _library_ because it's GPL. In

Re: [Freedos-devel] UPX/UCL Hell

2004-03-22 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Bart Oldeman escribió: On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote: I'd like to ask if someone has successfully compiled UPX/UCL. yes, but only on Linux. of those that I have corrected where due to things such as using SYSLIMITS.H not being present (it was SYSLIMIT.H, I guess t

Re: [Freedos-devel] UPX/UCL Hell

2004-03-22 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Bart, many thanks, you are absolutely right, I'll try and let you know. tom ehlert escribió: ASM> But anyway, and in order to avoid discrepancies, I'd like to use UPX/UCL ASM> if available Seems GPL forces you to use second best choice (similar to choosing LINUX) However, after rereading the

Re: [Freedos-devel] UPX/UCL Hell

2004-03-22 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, tom ehlert wrote: > ASM> But anyway, and in order to avoid discrepancies, I'd like to use UPX/UCL > ASM> if available > > Seems GPL forces you to use second best choice > (similar to choosing LINUX) Hmm. What's the best choice then? Solaris? FreeBSD? FreeDOS? For whom? :) Bu

Re: [Freedos-devel] UPX/UCL Hell

2004-03-22 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote: > I'd like to ask if someone has successfully compiled UPX/UCL. yes, but only on Linux. > of those that I have corrected where due to things such as using > SYSLIMITS.H not being present (it was SYSLIMIT.H, I guess that to follow > DOS 8.3 file

Re: [Freedos-devel] UPX/UCL Hell

2004-03-22 Thread tom ehlert
ASM> But anyway, and in order to avoid discrepancies, I'd like to use UPX/UCL ASM> if available Seems GPL forces you to use second best choice (similar to choosing LINUX) However, after rereading the *exact* GPL terms, I still consider an exepacker kind of runtime library. IFF it's ok to comp

[Freedos-devel] UPX/UCL Hell

2004-03-22 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, I'd like to ask if someone has successfully compiled UPX/UCL. I have spent several hours trying everything, and following the instructions, and whereas UCL compiled fine, it fails for UPX. As it seems I didn't download C++ in my old DJGPP distro, I updated with a minimal distro, set all the