Well, for one, I'm not sure if I could wrap that up into a debian
build script very well.
wt
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Blair Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not just use dosemu to compile in linux?
>
>
> Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
> colo
Why not just use dosemu to compile in linux?
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
David Letterman (1947 - )
See ya
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't use a batch file in my Linux
Eric Auer wrote:
>
> All of them, including OpenWatcom, should be available
> for Linux, but the OpenWatcom website says that their
> Linux/BSD port is work in progress so I do not know how
> good the current version is. There are also toolkits to
> make GNU C output DOS code but you cannot use th
Hi!
>> - SVN snapshot of FreeDOS 2038 stable kernel or similar
>> - NASM
>> - OpenWatcom C
>
> Are there any c compilers available for linux that will
> compile to intel realmode code?
>
>> - UPX (for example 2.x)
All of them, including OpenWatcom, should be available
for Linux, but the OpenWatc
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - SVN snapshot of FreeDOS 2038 stable kernel or similar
> - NASM
> - OpenWatcom C
Are there any c compilers available for linux that will compile to
intel realmode code?
> - UPX (for example 2.x)
>
> I think having a set of s
Hi,
uhm, would be very interesting having a tinderbox :)
See Ya,
Geraldo
São Paulo, Brasil, -3gmt
site: http://exdev.sf.net/
msn: geraldo_boca_at_hotmail.com
skype: geraldo-netto
icq: 145-061-456
2008/11/12 Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi!
>
>> I can't use a batch file in my Linux environ
Hi!
> I can't use a batch file in my Linux environment. Therefore, I have to
> write some script to compile it. I will look closer at the batch file
> and see about the XCPU setting.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/projects/dos_stuff/freedos_src/blah/kernel$ nasm
>>> asmsupt.asm
>>> segs.inc:34: error:
I can't use a batch file in my Linux environment. Therefore, I have to
write some script to compile it. I will look closer at the batch file
and see about the XCPU setting.
wt
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Geraldo Netto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Warren,
>
> How are you doing there?
>
> i
Hi Warren,
How are you doing there?
i'm pretty newbie to confirm it, but i think you **should**
use a bat called make.bat or something like that...
afaik, xcpu(for 8086 and 386) is also configured in this batch
See Ya,
Geraldo
São Paulo, Brasil, -3gmt
site: http://exdev.sf.net/
msn: geraldo_boc
So, I am messing around with compiling Freedos. I checked out the
lasted code from the Subversion repo, and I am working on Linux. It
seems there is no build system for Linux so I am trying to discover
some things.
Here's an example of something failing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/projects/dos_stuff/fre
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to
> > compile the kernel & freecom under borland c or djgpp?
>
> About FreeCOM: Let its author answer (he knows much better than me ;-)
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/freedos/f
At Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:31am -0500, Adam Peart wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to compile
> the kernel & freecom under borland c or djgpp?
Borland.
DJGPP can't do 16-bit.
-uso.
---
SF.Net is sponsore
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:11:12 -0500, Adam Peart wrote:
And what's the best way to download the latest sourcecode for the kernel?
http://freedos.sourceforge.net/kernel/kernel.tgz (CVS code updated one day after last CVS submit).
Lucho
---
SF.Net
At 12:13 PM 02/15/2004, you wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:31:41 -0500, Adam Peart wrote:
I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to compile
the kernel & freecom under borland c or djgpp?
About the kernel: The "official" and recommended compiler is Open Watcom,
but you can
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:31:41 -0500, Adam Peart wrote:
I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to compile the kernel & freecom under borland c or djgpp?
About the kernel: The "official" and recommended compiler is Open Watcom, but you can also use Turbo C, Borland C, or even
Hi!
15-Фев-2004 11:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Peart) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AP> I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to compile
AP> the kernel & freecom under borland c or djgpp?
1. Kernel _is_ compilable by BC.
2. DJGPP doesn't support segmented memory model (and
The email I sent was from my pop account adamatcapprogramming.com, but the
address I subscribed with is dosatcapprogramming.com. The header says
Envelope-to: dosatcapprogramming.com, but the from says From: Adam Peart
So that's why there's a duplicate post because
usually the adam got reject
I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to compile
the kernel & freecom under borland c or djgpp?
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DV
I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to compile
the kernel & freecom under borland c or djgpp?
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free D
19 matches
Mail list logo
