Hi Marco,
On ms-dos 6.22 using dir * is the same as use dir *.*
On Freedos dir * is the same as dir *.
Maybe related to a FreeCOM command.com issue: MS DOS command.com
has some extra handling for implicit wildcards, see Bugzilla:
Jim Hall wrote:
But I don't recall MS-DOS wildcards that way. I remember DIR * was
the same as DIR *. not DIR *.*. I guess I'm wrong.
Yes, you are wrong. ;-) Tested on MS-DOS 5.00 and 6.22.
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
Alain M. wrote:
Robert Riebisch escreveu:
Jim Hall wrote:
But I don't recall MS-DOS wildcards that way. I remember DIR * was
the same as DIR *. not DIR *.*. I guess I'm wrong.
Yes, you are wrong. ;-) Tested on MS-DOS 5.00 and 6.22.
Can you be more specific?
I think, it was clear
Dear Sirs
On ms-dos 6.22 using dir * is the same as use dir *.*
On Freedos dir * is the same as dir *.
Is a bug? The dir() function at euphoria language have
the same error. I suspect this come from an Watcom library function.
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Marco A. Achury
Tel: +58-(212)-6158777
Cel:
