Hi!
After some discussion with Eric, we decise that fixing non-filled
geometry should be in that way:
__O\_/_\_/O__
/* Linux dosfstools 'mkdosfs' treats all filesystems like images, so it does
not fill in the physical geometry. To ma
Hi!
28-Фев-2004 23:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I redirect this to group, because think this topic is important.
EA> Hi, you will never write a combined FAT16/FAT32 boot sector,
But I think about combined FAT12/FAT16.
EA> so please do not check whether
Hi!
28-Фев-2004 05:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> So it is POSSIBLE that the user next wants to use the same shell again. Or
EA> a typo in the SHELL= line threw him out of the shell. In both cases it would
EA> be nice to be able to use the old shell line as defau
Hi!
28-Фев-2004 05:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> - instead "<= FAT_MAGIC*" used "< FAT_MAGIC*" comparision. [BTW, FAT_MAGIC
>> and FAT_MAGIC16 should be FAT12_LAST and FAT16_LAST.] Currently I replace
>> this code by more compact code (suggested by Eric :), w
Following this discussion I looked at when and why I removed the
code we're talking about from HMA_TEXT.
It's not as easy as a mere code save.
It goes all the way back to kernel 2024a released Apr 16 2001. Before that
kernel there was a p_0() function in task.c.
Around that time we were making h
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:16:34 +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Well, but because those two are assigned to the terminate address of process0, you must initialize them. Regardless from where you start the Load-Process0 function.
Done now, but obviously your warning below is right.
Um, BTW: process0 mus
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:34:26 +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
maybe I totally misinterpreted the stuff, but Init_DosExec() from within kernel()
loads process0, right?? Init_DosExec eventually ends up in DosExec() -- or at least in
a function identical to it??
DosExec() spawns for example DosComLoade
Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
I tried to change user_r->CS and user_r->IP, but the linker complained.
Well, but because those two are assigned to the terminate address of
process0, you must initialize them. Regardless from where you start the
Load-Process0 function.
Um, BTW: process0 must also have
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 05:57:07 +0100 (MET), Eric Auer wrote:
if the old shell EXITs that does not necessarily mean that it FAILED.
Maybe the user simply selected something as shell which does allow him to exit.
So it is POSSIBLE that the user next wants to use the same shell again. Or
a typo in the
