Hi Tom,
> a)
> why do you need int2f/12 in the first first place ?
> are you really executing this from inside KERNEL ?
> do you really need to use internal functions ?
Yes. NLSFUNC implements kernel extensions to access NLS data from an
external file (namely COUNTRY.SYS) and these extensions are
Hi!
25-Июн-2004 20:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to "Arkady V.Belousov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> BTW, Eric says, that RBIL describes INT2F/122F functions, which (also)
>> sets returned DOS version.
te> INT 2F U - DOS 4.x internal - SET DOS VERSION NUMBER TO RETURN
te> have you ever
Hi!
25-Июн-2004 20:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to "Arkady V.Belousov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Eric Auer suggests, that VERSION= should change os_setver_m*, not
>> os_m*. What you think? Is there is bug in current FD and Eric's suggestion
>> is patch for this?
te> seems to be a bu
Hi!
25-Июн-2004 20:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Eduardo Casino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> + lrc = DosSeek(r.BX, (LONG)ULONG) (r.CX)) << 16) | r.DX), r.BP);
>> + if (lrc == -1)
>> +lrc = DE_INVLDHNDL;
>> + else
>> + {
>> +r.DX = (UWORD)(lrc >> 16)
Hello Eduardo,
> I'm implementing NLSFUNC for FreeDOS and I've found that many (most) of
> the needed MUX functions are missing.
> This patch implements functions 2F1226h to 2F1229h. This, together with
> my previous nls.c patch, allowed me to make a first working
> implementation of NLSFUNC's in
Hello Arkady,
> Eric Auer suggests, that VERSION= should change os_setver_m*, not
> os_m*. What you think? Is there is bug in current FD and Eric's suggestion
> is patch for this?
seems to be a bug indeed. seems noone is using
version=X.Y ;)
tom
Hello Arkady,
> BTW, Eric says, that RBIL describes INT2F/122F functions, which (also)
> sets returned DOS version.
INT 2F U - DOS 4.x internal - SET DOS VERSION NUMBER TO RETURN
AX = 122Fh
DX = DOS version number (h = return true DOS version)
have you ever seen DOS 4.
Hi!
25-Июн-2004 08:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steffen Kaiser) wrote
to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Trivial patch. Pass correct values for codepage and country from DOS-38
>> and DOS-65-XX functions to MUX-14 functions.
SK> I would actually suggest the following function, as searchPacka
El vie, 25-06-2004 a las 08:42, Steffen Kaiser escribió:
> I would actually suggest the following function, as searchPackage is
to
> resolve the default values as well; otherwise your patch breaks the
> possibility of non-direct (MUX-only) country data, which in turn
breaks
> the whole current N
