Hi Abrahan,
> Ex-FAT support instead of FAT+ or FAT32+??
>
> This idea seems more good like FAT+ instead :-)
>
> And how is the support for Windows 3.1 / 3.11?
While it is called FAT, exFAT seems to differ a lot
from FAT. Also, exFAT is heavily patented... Talking
about FAT+... I really wonder
Ex-FAT support instead of FAT+ or FAT32+??
This idea seems more good like FAT+ instead :-)
And how is the support for Windows 3.1 / 3.11?
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 10:26 PM
Subject: Freedos-kernel Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1
> Send Freedos-kernel mailing
