Re: [Freedos-kernel] Fwd: [Freedos-user] Any interest in 486, 586, 686 kernels?

2013-05-06 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Louis Santillan schreef op 6-5-2013 5:42: > Why does it fail? Relocation? No idea, I'm not a programmer nor gained as much experience as Rugxulo did, as a user. The binary is compressed and I think either patched or some header added, to make it bootable as a kernel file. It works for NRV and

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Fwd: [Freedos-user] Any interest in 486, 586, 686 kernels?

2013-05-05 Thread Louis Santillan
fdoos.org seems to be down at the moment. Forgot to mention that in case Jeremy is around. On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Louis Santillan wrote: > See inline... > > On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Bernd Blaauw wrote: > >> Louis Santillan schreef op 5-5-2013 18:28: >> > Whoops, didn't realize

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Fwd: [Freedos-user] Any interest in 486, 586, 686 kernels?

2013-05-05 Thread Louis Santillan
See inline... On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Bernd Blaauw wrote: > Louis Santillan schreef op 5-5-2013 18:28: > > Whoops, didn't realize that I replied to fd-user instead of kernel. > > > > One other note, all kernels are slightly bigger withe options I set. > > I guess it depends on what the c

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Fwd: [Freedos-user] Any interest in 486, 586, 686 kernels?

2013-05-05 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Louis Santillan schreef op 5-5-2013 18:28: > Whoops, didn't realize that I replied to fd-user instead of kernel. > > One other note, all kernels are slightly bigger withe options I set. I guess it depends on what the compilers do: [1] optimize for certain processor architecture(s) [2] also keep ba

[Freedos-kernel] Fwd: [Freedos-user] Any interest in 486, 586, 686 kernels?

2013-05-05 Thread Louis Santillan
Whoops, didn't realize that I replied to fd-user instead of kernel. One other note, all kernels are slightly bigger withe options I set. -L -- Forwarded message -- From: Louis Santillan Date: Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:01 AM Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Any interest in 486, 586, 686 k