Re: [Freedos-user] chkdsk broken?

IIRC chkdsk does not support FAT32 filesystems. This might be your issue. On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Christian Groessler wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using FreeDOS 1.0. > > When I run "dosfsck c:" it reports everything ok: > > dosfsck 2.11.DOS, 15 Apr 2006, FAT32, LFN > c:: 4191 files, 6623/62597

Re: [Freedos-user] Freedos 1.1 status???

> There is a problem here: There are 2 pirates programs there: pkzip and > arj. Can this be removed arj is open-source (http://arj.sourceforge.net/) and pkzip afaik can be redistributed (but not the source). -- __

Re: [Freedos-user] XGCDROM and CD/DVD Recording

> There is no physical SCSI bus in that machine. > The disk wodim found must be the virtual device > created by aspi.sys. Yes; cdrecord and wodim cannot use ATAPI devices directly in DOS; that's why they > Regards, >  JAS > > > -

[Freedos-user] XGCDROM and CD/DVD Recording

Blair Campbell said: >Did you load aspi.sys after xcdrom? Yes, and it did create a new DOS character device: SCSIMGR$ >Try running wodim -scanbus and see if it finds your >drive. >You might need to specify dev=3Dx,x,x >to tell it which drive to use. Running wodim -scanbus results (after

Re: [Freedos-user] Freedos 1.1 status???

Geraldo Netto escreveu: > "certified"(okay) packages are at > http://www.viste-family.net/mateusz/fdupdate/ There is a problem here: There are 2 pirates programs there: pkzip and arj. Can this be removed Alain --

Re: [Freedos-user] Freedos 1.1 status???

Guys, Packages are been verified by Mateusz please, check and help him i've send him 123 packages that i've done by myself the list goes from common stuff to perl and lua "certified"(okay) packages are at http://www.viste-family.net/mateusz/fdupdate/ and work in progress packages are at http://w

Re: [Freedos-user] Freedos 1.1 status???

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Jim Hall wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Michael Robinson > wrote: > > What is the status of Freedos 1.1? It has been a while since the you > > can help link has been updated. > > > > I believe the core issues haven't changed: > > 1. The new FDUPDATE i

[Freedos-user] MSCLIENT problems

Hi, again using FreeDOS 1.0... I cannot copy files to network drives. Making a directory on a network drive works, as well as removing it ("md" and "rd"). But when I try to copy a file onto the network drive I get an error. This is with both Samba and WinXP servers. (The error messages are diff

Re: [Freedos-user] network drive

--- Christian Masloch schrieb am Do, 2.4.2009: > > Umm, yes it does after you modified a drive's CDS to > show that it's a > redirected drive. So get familiar with some of the data > described at > Int21.52 (MS-DOS 4+ CDS and SFT, MS-DOS 5+ List of Lists) > and some of the > Int2F.12 func

[Freedos-user] chkdsk broken?

Hi, I'm using FreeDOS 1.0. When I run "dosfsck c:" it reports everything ok: dosfsck 2.11.DOS, 15 Apr 2006, FAT32, LFN c:: 4191 files, 6623/62597 clusters When I run "chkdsk" it reports many problems: ChkDsk beta 0.9 Copyright 2002, 2003 Imre Leber under the GNU GPL \KERNEL.SYS has an inva

Re: [Freedos-user] sshdos - was: network drive

Michael Reichenbach wrote: > There is > - SSHDOS v0.95 November 25, 2003 and > - SSH2DOS v0.2.1 from April 23, 2006 > > Why the more recent version has a lower version number? Because SSH*2*DOS is the successor to SSHDOS. > What are the differences? Quoting : SS

Re: [Freedos-user] sshdos - was: network drive

On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:04, Michael Reichenbach wrote: > - SSHDOS v0.95 November 25, 2003 and > - SSH2DOS v0.2.1 from April 23, 2006 > > Why the more recent version has a lower version number? 'cause it is not the same client. SSH2DOS supports SSHv2, while SSHDOS supports SSHv1. Regards, M

Re: [Freedos-user] sshdos - was: network drive

There is - SSHDOS v0.95 November 25, 2003 and - SSH2DOS v0.2.1 from April 23, 2006 Why the more recent version has a lower version number? What are the differences? There is also patch "ROM-DOS Sockets patch" from August 25, 2008, what does it do? -mr Alain M. schrieb: > Michael Reichenbach es

Re: [Freedos-user] network drive

Christian Masloch schrieb: >> It's a client and not a network drive. > > So a network drive that shows you a directory of a network server would be > no network client? You can perhaps always call it client. But network drive is only the right word if it works in background and you get an addi

Re: [Freedos-user] network drive

> we all know that it's possible to service INT 21 calls in straight C, > with very little assembly > > hint: look into the FreeDOS kernel sources Yes, by "servicing the DOS calls" (talking about the redirector, Int2F too) I meant the initial assembler entry and setup, which is in files like k

Re: [Freedos-user] network drive

> Umm, yes it does after you modified a drive's CDS to show that it's a > redirected drive. So get familiar with some of the data described at > Int21.52 (MS-DOS 4+ CDS and SFT, MS-DOS 5+ List of Lists) and some of the > Int2F.12 functions, too. The free SHSUCDX source contains all of this > (alt

Re: [Freedos-user] network drive

Michael Reichenbach escreveu: > Eric Auer schrieb: >> Hi! >> >>> Like I suggested an SFTP client using XMS or JLM. >> There are already SSH, SCP and SFTP 1 and 2 clients, >> called SSHDOS: http://sshdos.sourceforge.net/ > > It's a client and not a network drive. This could be a very intereting s

Re: [Freedos-user] LFN in FreeDOS kernel? - was: aimed compatibility?

Eric Auer schrieb: > Hi, > LFN for FAT and for NTFS are working stable in Linux. Could a FreeDOS developer grab this free knowledge from Linux and improve DOSLFN this >>> way? >>> very unlikely. Linux drivers are too different from DOS kernel or DOS >>> TSR to be useful >> What about bri

Re: [Freedos-user] network drive

> It's a client and not a network drive. So a network drive that shows you a directory of a network server would be no network client? -- ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos

Re: [Freedos-user] network drive

Eric Auer schrieb: > Hi! > >> Like I suggested an SFTP client using XMS or JLM. > > There are already SSH, SCP and SFTP 1 and 2 clients, > called SSHDOS: http://sshdos.sourceforge.net/ It's a client and not a network drive. -mr -

Re: [Freedos-user] network drive

>> Like I suggested an SFTP client using XMS or JLM. > > There are already SSH, SCP and SFTP 1 and 2 clients, > called SSHDOS: http://sshdos.sourceforge.net/ > >> SFTP is free, secure and wildly supported across all operating systems >> already. >> >>> Is there some information about how to write n

Re: [Freedos-user] LFN in FreeDOS kernel? - was: aimed compatibility?

Hi, >>> LFN for FAT and for NTFS are working stable in Linux. Could a FreeDOS >>> developer grab this free knowledge from Linux and improve DOSLFN this >> way? >> very unlikely. Linux drivers are too different from DOS kernel or DOS >> TSR to be useful > What about bringing the FUSE interface to

Re: [Freedos-user] network drive

Hi! > Like I suggested an SFTP client using XMS or JLM. There are already SSH, SCP and SFTP 1 and 2 clients, called SSHDOS: http://sshdos.sourceforge.net/ > SFTP is free, secure and wildly supported across all operating systems > already. > >> Is there some information about how to write netwo