Crisis averted. :-)
-Mike
Robert Riebisch wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>You have probably noticed, that I have received a lot of public feedback
>(plus a few private mails) on my announcement to close this forum.
>Thanks for that! I didn't know, that this forum is such an important
>part of the DOS com
Dear all,
You have probably noticed, that I have received a lot of public feedback
(plus a few private mails) on my announcement to close this forum.
Thanks for that! I didn't know, that this forum is such an important
part of the DOS community.
Today I have also received a //large// donation via
Em 14-09-2011 08:14, Zbigniew escreveu:
>
> But, actually, why you want another DOSBOX to be created? You've got
> already DOSBOX and DOSEMU... it's not enough?
Well, it is not really satisfactory. DosBox does not have packet driver
for networking and Dosemu is not getting any updates ant it get
On 9/14/2011 6:14 AM, Zbigniew wrote:
> Most probably you can run on your multicore machine concurrent
> sessions of DOSBOX (or DOSEMU).
>> modern hardware can emulate older hardware. Now you have
>> a clean means of supporting modern hardware for people using old DOS
>> applications. Want your
2011/9/14, Michael C. Robinson :
> [..] One interesting option on say a quad
> core system is to have the 32 bit OS partition the memory, the monitor,
> the hard disk, and the cpu cores so you can have multiple concurrent 16
> bit Freedos instances.
Something similar have been done even at 386-t
