--- Blair Campbell schrieb am Fr, 3.4.2009:
> IIRC chkdsk does not support FAT32 filesystems. This might
> be your issue.
No, it's a FAT16 filesystem. When I boot MS-DOS 6.22 from CD it
can read it fine and its chkdsk doesn't report any problems.
chris
Hi,
again using FreeDOS 1.0...
I cannot copy files to network drives. Making a directory
on a network drive works, as well as removing it ("md" and "rd").
But when I try to copy a file onto the network drive I get an
error. This is with both Samba and WinXP servers. (The error
messages are diff
--- Christian Masloch schrieb am Do, 2.4.2009:
>
> Umm, yes it does after you modified a drive's CDS to
> show that it's a
> redirected drive. So get familiar with some of the data
> described at
> Int21.52 (MS-DOS 4+ CDS and SFT, MS-DOS 5+ List of Lists)
> and some of the
> Int2F.12 func
Hi,
I'm using FreeDOS 1.0.
When I run "dosfsck c:" it reports everything ok:
dosfsck 2.11.DOS, 15 Apr 2006, FAT32, LFN
c:: 4191 files, 6623/62597 clusters
When I run "chkdsk" it reports many problems:
ChkDsk beta 0.9
Copyright 2002, 2003 Imre Leber under the GNU GPL
\KERNEL.SYS has an inva
> >> If you want you can setup a FTP server on DOS
> running as
> >> TSR in background.
> >>
> http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.Servers
> >
> > ?? This is a completely different topic.
>
> No, since you asked for connecting to file server share in
> a modern
Hi,
> If you want you can setup a FTP server on DOS running as
> TSR in background.
> http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.Servers
?? This is a completely different topic.
> msclient is nice to mount a remote server into a DOS device
> letter,
> unfortunately
Hi all,
after having my FreeDOS installation basically up and running,
I'd like to ask what the preferred method to connect to a
file server share is these days.
I'm currently using MSCLIENT to connect to a samba share, but
MSCLIENT is a memory hog and I'd prefer a better solution.
Back in the
Hi,
> actually I would recommend to tell GRUB to not manipulate
> the partition table at all. Why should it hide FAT from
> Linux or XP? Why should it hide XP and Linux from DOS?
> All three operating systems are smart enough to know the
> drive letter from which they are booting, although I am
>
Hello Christian,
> Although it sounds strange if GRUB itself can't use the "hidden
> extended" partition, I would also suspect this is done by GRUB, not
> FreeDOS. I think there's actually no code in FreeDOS (kernel) to write
> to the partition table, and if it was written by accident, it would
Hi Eric,
> Note how the first partition changed from HIDDEN FAT16 to
> NORMAL FAT16 and the active partition changed from NTFS to
> FAT16. The change from 5 to 15 is from CHS extended to
> LBA extended, you just used a very old software to display
> your partition table. I also think that this hi
Hi,
I have a machine with a 160GB drive, and many partitions with different
Linux and Windows versions.
I'm using grub as main boot loader.
After booting FreeDOS (which resides on the first partition) the extended
partition is marked as "Unknown".
Partition table before:
Device Boot Start
11 matches
Mail list logo
