[Freedos-user] Balder

2007-04-05 Thread Florian Xaver
Hi, I tested this boot discs. I like it! Some ideas: *using jemm386 *using xfdisk instead of fdisk *including doslfn *including hx-extender bye Flo -- Private Page, oZone GUI Club Dr-DOS Wiki Using Arachne, the GPL Web Browser/Suite -

[Freedos-user] Balder: Can't move system files into \fdos

2010-08-05 Thread Mike Eriksen
I've been playing with Balder 1.0 and customized it to my likings, no problem. However then I decided to clean up a bit and move all files but command.com, fdconfig.sys and autoexec.bat to a subdirectory name fdos (A:\fdos) and edit fdconfig.sys to include A:\fdos\ in front of all drivers/programs.

Re: [Freedos-user] Balder: Can't move system files into \fdos

2010-08-05 Thread Tom Ehlert
kernel.sys Tom -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: ht

Re: [Freedos-user] Balder: Can't move system files into \fdos

2010-08-05 Thread Mike Eriksen
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Tom Ehlert wrote: > kernel.sys > > Tom Thank you for your answer, but I'm afraid you have to spell it out. There is no kernel.sys in the Balder image - at least not any that can be seen by a "ls -al" or "find". Mike --

Re: [Freedos-user] Balder: Can't move system files into \fdos

2010-08-05 Thread Tom Ehlert
>> kernel.sys >> >> Tom > Thank you for your answer, but I'm afraid you have to spell it out. > There is no kernel.sys in the Balder image - at least not any that can > be seen by a "ls -al" or "find". the 'at least' part is important. and moving kernel.sys into a subdirectory is a bad idea Tom

Re: [Freedos-user] Balder: Can't move system files into \fdos

2010-08-05 Thread Mike Eriksen
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Tom Ehlert wrote: >>> kernel.sys >>> >>> Tom > >> Thank you for your answer, but I'm afraid you have to spell it out. >> There is no kernel.sys in the Balder image - at least not any that can >> be seen by a "ls -al" or "find". > > the 'at least' part is important.