On 10/14/2021 4:06 AM, Jon Brase wrote:
Oct 13, 2021 23:39:17 Jim Hall
It appears that somewhere along the line, someone (at AMD?) had access
to the sources, probably in a larger source tree, and ran a batch job
or script to apply the "AMD" statement to a bunch of source files. And
that
> Hi Jim and Everyone,
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:58 AM Jim Hall wrote:
> [..]
>
> *If you agree or disagree, I'd appreciate your reply to this email.
> Agreement can be simply "agree" or "+1". If you disagree, please
> discuss. (But consensus from the last discussion favored including
>
Hi Jim and Everyone,
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:58 AM Jim Hall wrote:
> [..]
> *If you agree or disagree, I'd appreciate your reply to this email.
> Agreement can be simply "agree" or "+1". If you disagree, please
> discuss. (But consensus from the last discussion favored including
> FDNET, so
Oct 13, 2021 23:39:17 Jim Hall
>
>
> It appears that somewhere along the line, someone (at AMD?) had access
> to the sources, probably in a larger source tree, and ran a batch job
> or script to apply the "AMD" statement to a bunch of source files. And
> that happened to catch these GPL and
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:44 AM Brandon Taylor
> wrote:
> >
> > I've just installed FreeDOS 1.3-RC4 on a virtual machine, and,
> > upon running FDIMPLES, discovered that FDNET is nowhere to be
> > found. What's the issue here?
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:58 AM Jim Hall wrote:
>
> I had asked
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:44 AM Brandon Taylor
wrote:
>
> I've just installed FreeDOS 1.3-RC4 on a virtual machine, and,
> upon running FDIMPLES, discovered that FDNET is nowhere to be
> found. What's the issue here?
I had asked that we not include FDNET in FreeDOS 1.3 RC4 due to
license
I've just installed FreeDOS 1.3-RC4 on a virtual machine, and, upon running
FDIMPLES, discovered that FDNET is nowhere to be found. What's the issue here?
Brandon Taylor
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
