On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 16:35 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486? I lost the link to
> > fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it in fdupdate
> > v0.54. If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
> > coprocessor or somethi
Hi,
> Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486? I lost the link to
> fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it in fdupdate
> v0.54. If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
> coprocessor or something similar, that would be nice to know.
>
> I've noticed that I
On Monday 20 April 2009 00:08 (CEST), Michael Robinson wrote:
> Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486? I lost the link to
> fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it
Hi,
You didn't lose it, it simply never existed :)
I sent you a beta FDUPDATE version with support for the HTG
Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486? I lost the link to
fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it in fdupdate
v0.54. If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
coprocessor or something similar, that would be nice to know.
I've noticed that I get a C prompt ba
