On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On 2018-07-11 14:51, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:11 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Vivek Gautam
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Tomasz,
On 2018-07-11 14:51, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:11 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Vivek Gautam
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
>>> wrote:
On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:10 PM CEST Vivek Gautam
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:27:00PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:47 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 05:39:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> The timespec structure and associated interfaces are deprecated and will
> >> be removed in the future
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:11 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Vivek Gautam
> wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > wrote:
> >> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:10 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>> From: Sricharan R
On 7/11/2018 4:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Thanks for review.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:11 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
From: Sricharan R
The smmu device
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Vivek Gautam
wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:10 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> From: Sricharan R
>>>
>>> The smmu needs to be functional only when the respective
>>> master's
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Thanks for review.
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:11 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> > From: Sricharan R
>> >
>> > The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove
Hi Rafael,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:10 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> From: Sricharan R
>>
>> The smmu needs to be functional only when the respective
>> master's using it are active. The device_link feature
>> helps to track such
Hi Rafael,
On 7/11/2018 3:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:12 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
From: Sricharan R
Finally add the device link between the master device and
smmu, so that the smmu gets runtime enabled/disabled only when the
master needs it. This is done
Hi Rafael,
Thanks for review.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:11 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > From: Sricharan R
> >
> > The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> > gets called when the smmu is not linked
On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:12 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R
>
> Finally add the device link between the master device and
> smmu, so that the smmu gets runtime enabled/disabled only when the
> master needs it. This is done from add_device callback which gets
> called once
On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:11 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R
>
> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those
On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:10 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R
>
> The smmu needs to be functional only when the respective
> master's using it are active. The device_link feature
> helps to track such functional dependencies, so that the
> iommu gets powered when the master
13 matches
Mail list logo
