On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:42 AM Jordan Crouse wrote:
>
> Commit e812744c5f95 ("drm: msm: a6xx: Add support for A618") added a
> universal GBIF un-halt into a6xx_start(). This can cause problems for
> a630 targets which do not use GBIF and might have access protection
> enabled on the region now occ
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:01 AM Jordan Crouse wrote:
>
> Fixup the GMU bus table values for the sc7180 target.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse
I suspect that we'll need to figure out a better way to get these
values from the interconnect driver in the long run, esp. since there
are several diffe
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 12:48 PM Jordan Crouse wrote:
>
> Commit e812744c5f95 ("drm: msm: a6xx: Add support for A618") missed
> updating the VBIF flush in a6xx_gmu_shutdown and instead
> inserted the new sequence into a6xx_pm_suspend along with a redundant
> GMU idle.
>
> Move a6xx_bus_clear_pendin
Commit e812744c5f95 ("drm: msm: a6xx: Add support for A618") missed
updating the VBIF flush in a6xx_gmu_shutdown and instead
inserted the new sequence into a6xx_pm_suspend along with a redundant
GMU idle.
Move a6xx_bus_clear_pending_transactions to a6xx_gmu.c and use it in
the appropriate place in
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:42 AM Jordan Crouse wrote:
>
> Commit e812744c5f95 ("drm: msm: a6xx: Add support for A618") added a
> universal GBIF un-halt into a6xx_start(). This can cause problems for
> a630 targets which do not use GBIF and might have access protection
> enabled on the region now occ
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:02 PM Sharat Masetty wrote:
>
> + power-domains = <&gpucc CX_GDSC>, <&gpucc GX_GDSC>;
I should note that this is going to be a PITA to land because the
patch adding "GX_GDSC" should technically land in the "clk" tree.
Without extra work that's
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:01 PM Sharat Masetty wrote:
>
> From: Taniya Das
>
> In the cases where the GPU SW requires to use the GX GDSCR add
> support for the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das
Since you are re-posting Taniya's patch you need to add your own
Signed-off-by as per kernel p
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:02 PM Sharat Masetty wrote:
>
> From: Taniya Das
>
> Most of the time the CPU should not be touching the GX domain on the
> GPU
> except for a very special use case when the CPU needs to force the GX
Really weird word-wrapping? You've also indented your whole c
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:02 PM Sharat Masetty wrote:
>
> This patch adds the required dt nodes and properties
> to enabled A618 GPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 102
> +++
> 1 file changed, 102 insertions
Fixup the GMU bus table values for the sc7180 target.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c | 85 ---
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adr
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:36:29 +0530, Harigovindan P wrote:
> Add bindings for visionox rm69299 panel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harigovindan P
> ---
>
> Changes in v1:
> - Added a compatible string to support sc7180 panel version.
> Changes in v2:
> - Removed unwanted properties from descrip
Add support for Visionox panel driver.
Signed-off-by: Harigovindan P
---
Changes in v1:
- Split out panel driver patch from dsi config changes(Rob Clark).
- Remove unrelated code(Stephen Boyd).
- Remove static arrays to make regulator setup open coded
in probe(Ste
Adding support for visionox rm69299 panel driver and adding bindings for the
same panel.
Harigovindan P (2):
dt-bindings: display: add visionox rm69299 panel variant
drm/panel: add support for rm69299 visionox panel driver
.../bindings/display/visionox,rm69299.yaml | 109 ++
dri
Add bindings for visionox rm69299 panel.
Signed-off-by: Harigovindan P
---
Changes in v1:
- Added a compatible string to support sc7180 panel version.
Changes in v2:
- Removed unwanted properties from description.
- Creating source files without execute permissions(Rob He
14 matches
Mail list logo
