On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:30:57PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 01:04:06PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark
> >
> > NOTE: I have re-ordered the series, and propose that we could merge this
> > series in the following order:
> >
> >1) 01-11 - merge
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:31 PM Will Deacon wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 01:04:06PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark
> >
> > NOTE: I have re-ordered the series, and propose that we could merge this
> > series in the following order:
> >
> >1) 01-11 - merge via drm
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:03:49PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-09-21 19:03, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 07:57:18PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> > > Add a quirk IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_SYS_CACHE to override the
> > > attributes set in TCR for the page table walker when
>
On 2020-09-21 19:03, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 07:57:18PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
Add a quirk IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_SYS_CACHE to override the
attributes set in TCR for the page table walker when
using system cache.
I wonder if the panfrost folks can reuse this for the
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 01:04:06PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> NOTE: I have re-ordered the series, and propose that we could merge this
> series in the following order:
>
>1) 01-11 - merge via drm / msm-next
>2) 12-15 - merge via iommu, no dependency on
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 07:57:18PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> Add a quirk IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_SYS_CACHE to override the
> attributes set in TCR for the page table walker when
> using system cache.
I wonder if the panfrost folks can reuse this for the issue discussed
over at:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:03:32 +0200
Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Huge thanks again to the entire team from Intel, for their great work
> organizing XDC 2020, our first virtual conference!
>
> As usual we're looking for feedback on both XDC itself, and the CFP
> process and
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 8:27 AM Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>
> Leave the inuse count intact on map failure to keep the accounting
> accurate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 8:27 AM Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>
> In the case where we have a back-to-back submission that shares the same
> BO, this BO will be prematurely moved to inactive_list while retiring the
> first submit. But it will be still part of the second submit which is
> being processed
Leave the inuse count intact on map failure to keep the accounting
accurate.
Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
index
In the case where we have a back-to-back submission that shares the same
BO, this BO will be prematurely moved to inactive_list while retiring the
first submit. But it will be still part of the second submit which is
being processed by the GPU. Now, if the shrinker happens to be triggered at
this
First off, I think you all did a fantastic job. I felt that things
ran very smoothly and, as far as the talks themselves go, I think it
went almost as smoothly as an in-person XDC. I'm really quite
impressed. I do have a couple pieces of more nuanced feedback:
1. I think we were maybe a bit
Hi all,
Huge thanks again to the entire team from Intel, for their great work
organizing XDC 2020, our first virtual conference!
As usual we're looking for feedback on both XDC itself, and the CFP
process and program selection. Both about what was great and should be
kept for next year's
13 matches
Mail list logo
