Quoting Sankeerth Billakanti (2021-11-15 23:07:38)
> Some legacy eDP sinks may not support SSC. The support for SSC is
> indicated through an opts flag from the controller driver. This
> change will enable SSC only if the sink supports it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti
> ---
I suppose
Quoting Sankeerth Billakanti (2021-11-15 23:07:37)
> The sc7280 platform supports native eDP controller and PHY.
> This change will add support for the eDP PHY on sc7280.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2021-11-16 08:43:38)
>
> On 11/15/2021 3:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2021-11-02 16:44:33)
>
> From: Kuogee Hsieh
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh
> ---
>
> What tree is this based on? I don't see edp_phy upstream for
On 11/15/2021 12:23 PM, khs...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2021-11-09 13:38, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
From: Kuogee Hsieh
Current DP drivers have regulators, clocks, irq and phy are grouped
together within a function and executed not in a symmetric manner.
This increase difficulty of code
Currently the msm_dp_*** functions implement the same sequence which would
happen when drm_bridge is used. hence get rid of this intermediate layer
and align with the drm_bridge usage to avoid customized implementation.
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh
Changes in v2:
-- revise commit text
-- rename
On 11/15/2021 3:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2021-11-02 16:44:33)
From: Kuogee Hsieh
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh
---
What tree is this based on? I don't see edp_phy upstream for sc7280
this patch is depend on --> [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280:
add edp
