Hi
Am 29.05.22 um 18:29 schrieb Rob Clark:
From: Rob Clark
If a GEM object is allocated, and then exported as a dma-buf fd which is
mmap'd before or without the GEM buffer being directly mmap'd, the
vma_node could be unitialized. This leads to a situation where the CPU
mapping is not correctl
The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move
it after checking.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/
From: Lv Ruyi
[ Upstream commit b9e4f1d2b505df8e2439b63e67afaa287c1c43e2 ]
The irq_of_parse_and_map() function returns 0 on failure, and does not
return an negative value.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot
Signed-off-by: Lv Ruyi
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.or
From: Lv Ruyi
[ Upstream commit b9e4f1d2b505df8e2439b63e67afaa287c1c43e2 ]
The irq_of_parse_and_map() function returns 0 on failure, and does not
return an negative value.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot
Signed-off-by: Lv Ruyi
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.or
From: Lv Ruyi
[ Upstream commit b9e4f1d2b505df8e2439b63e67afaa287c1c43e2 ]
The irq_of_parse_and_map() function returns 0 on failure, and does not
return an negative value.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot
Signed-off-by: Lv Ruyi
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.or
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:26 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 29.05.22 um 18:29 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > From: Rob Clark
> >
> > If a GEM object is allocated, and then exported as a dma-buf fd which is
> > mmap'd before or without the GEM buffer being directly mmap'd, the
> > vma_node cou
Hi
Am 30.05.22 um 15:47 schrieb Rob Clark:
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:26 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 29.05.22 um 18:29 schrieb Rob Clark:
From: Rob Clark
If a GEM object is allocated, and then exported as a dma-buf fd which is
mmap'd before or without the GEM buffer being directly m
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 7:16 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 30.05.22 um 15:47 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:26 AM Thomas Zimmermann
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Am 29.05.22 um 18:29 schrieb Rob Clark:
> >>> From: Rob Clark
> >>>
> >>> If a GEM object is alloc
On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 15:54, Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:26 AM Thomas Zimmermann
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 29.05.22 um 18:29 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > From: Rob Clark
> > >
> > > If a GEM object is allocated, and then exported as a dma-buf fd which is
> > > mmap'd befor
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 7:49 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 15:54, Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:26 AM Thomas Zimmermann
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Am 29.05.22 um 18:29 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > > From: Rob Clark
> > > >
> > > > If a GEM obje
Hi
Am 30.05.22 um 17:41 schrieb Rob Clark:
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 7:49 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 15:54, Rob Clark wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:26 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 29.05.22 um 18:29 schrieb Rob Clark:
From: Rob Clark
If a GEM object is allo
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:20 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 30.05.22 um 17:41 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 7:49 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 15:54, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:26 AM Thomas Zimmermann
> >>> wr
A nit: patchwork thinks that two patches from the same author with the
same subject are two versions of the same patch. In future, could you
please send such patches with distinct names? No need to send v2 now
unless review shows other issues with the patches.
On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 10:33, Haowen
On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 05:20, Haowen Bai wrote:
>
> The phys_enc->wb_idx is dereferencing before null checking, so move
> it after checking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Revi
On 5/30/2022 12:33 AM, Haowen Bai wrote:
The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move
it after checking.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai
Agree with Dmitry's comment. Adjust the patch subject to a different one
otherwise PW thinks they are same patches.
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar
在 2022/5/30 下午3:33, Haowen Bai 写道:
> The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move
> it after checking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp
在 2022/5/31 上午8:36, Abhinav Kumar 写道:
>
>
> On 5/30/2022 12:33 AM, Haowen Bai wrote:
>> The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move
>> it after checking.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai
>
> Agree with Dmitry's comment. Adjust the patch subject to a different one
> otherwise PW thin
17 matches
Mail list logo
