Quoting Kalyan Thota (2022-09-08 00:26:28)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
> index a35ecb6..bbda09a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
> @@ -307,6
On 11/09/2022 20:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> If your child schema fails, the referencing schema fails as well...
>
>
> Although now with DSI-PHY I cannot reproduce it and I am pretty sure I
> reproduced it with DPU controllers after modifying the DTS to lack a
> property... Hmmm
On 11/09/2022 20:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> /home/krzk/dev/linux/linux/out/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sda660-inforce-ifc6560.dtb:
>> dsi@c994000: 'vdda-supply' does not match any of the regexes:
>> 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>
>>
>>
>> If your child schema fails, the referencing schema fails as
On 11/09/2022 20:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/09/2022 19:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 16:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/09/2022 15:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
>
> On
On 11/09/2022 19:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 16:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/09/2022 15:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>> wrote:
On 10/09/2022 14:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>
>>
On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 16:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
>
> On 11/09/2022 15:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/09/2022 14:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> However I think there is no such problem, as Dmitry
On 11/09/2022 15:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/09/2022 14:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
However I think there is no such problem, as Dmitry said, that ref
changes anything. There will be always failure - either
On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
>
> On 10/09/2022 14:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>
> >> However I think there is no such problem, as Dmitry said, that ref
> >> changes anything. There will be always failure - either from parent
> >> schema (using $ref) or from device
On 10/09/2022 14:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>
>> However I think there is no such problem, as Dmitry said, that ref
>> changes anything. There will be always failure - either from parent
>> schema (using $ref) or from device child schema (the one which actually
>> misses the property).
>
>