On Sun Apr 7, 2024 at 5:15 AM CEST, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 18:49, Marijn Suijten
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2024-03-30 05:52:29, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > In case of CMD DSI panels, the vblank IRQ can be used outside of
> > > irq_enable/irq_disable pair. This results in the
This mostly involves importing the list of registers to dump from kgsl
and plumbing them through. We also need to update registers from Mesa to
pull in some AQE-related registers for dumping the AQE equivalents of
the SQE_STAT, UCODE_DBG_INFO, and ROQ indexed registers.
I tested this with msm_reco
Import from kgsl commit 809ee24fe560.
Signed-off-by: Connor Abbott
---
.../gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gen7_9_0_snapshot.h | 1426
1 file changed, 1426 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gen7_9_0_snapshot.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gen7_
Add A7XX prefixes necessary because we use the same code for dumping
a6xx and a7xx, fix register name prefixes for upstream, and use the
upstream header.
---
.../gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gen7_9_0_snapshot.h | 888 +++--
1 file changed, 454 insertions(+), 434 deletions(-)
diff --
Update to Mesa commit e82d70d472cc ("freedreno/a7xx: Add
A7XX_HLSQ_DP_STR location from kgsl").
Signed-off-by: Connor Abbott
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/registers/adreno/a6xx.xml | 47 +--
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/regi
Add an a750 case to the various places where we choose a list of
registers.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c | 64 +
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/
Use the kgsl-style list of indices, because this is about to change for
a750 and we want to reuse the downstream header directly.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.h | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -
Hi Dmitry,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 05:22:54PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> We don't need to run the validation of the XML files if we are just
> compiling the kernel. Skip the validation unless the user enables
> corresponding Kconfig option. This removes a warning from gen_header.py
> about l
In order to remove pointless messages regarding missing lxml, skip
validation of MSM register files against the schema. Only the driver
developers really care and/or can fix the files.
Keep the validation enabled during one of DRM CI stages, so that we
still catch errors, introduced by mistake.
T
We don't need to run the validation of the XML files if we are just
compiling the kernel. Skip the validation unless the user enables
corresponding Kconfig option. This removes a warning from gen_header.py
about lxml being not installed.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell
Closes: https://lore.kernel.o
In order to validate drm/msm register definition files against schema,
reuse the nodebugfs build step. The validation entry is guarded by
the EXPERT Kconfig option and we don't want to enable that option for
all the builds.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ci/build.sh | 3 +++
On 5/3/2024 11:15 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
We don't need to run the validation of the XML files if we are just
compiling the kernel. Skip the validation unless the user enables
corresponding Kconfig option. This removes a warning from gen_header.py
about lxml being not installed.
Reported-
On 5/3/2024 11:15 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
In order to validate drm/msm register definition files against schema,
reuse the nodebugfs build step. The validation entry is guarded by
the EXPERT Kconfig option and we don't want to enable that option for
all the builds.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry B
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 22:42, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/3/2024 11:15 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > In order to validate drm/msm register definition files against schema,
> > reuse the nodebugfs build step. The validation entry is guarded by
> > the EXPERT Kconfig option and we don't want
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 21:15, Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> In order to remove pointless messages regarding missing lxml, skip
> validation of MSM register files against the schema. Only the driver
> developers really care and/or can fix the files.
>
> Keep the validation enabled during one of DRM CI
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 09:48:12AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 05:22:54PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > We don't need to run the validation of the XML files if we are just
> > compiling the kernel. Skip the validation unless the user enables
> > co
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 11:18:52AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Sun Apr 7, 2024 at 5:15 AM CEST, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 18:49, Marijn Suijten
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2024-03-30 05:52:29, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > In case of CMD DSI panels, the vblank IRQ can be
On 5/3/2024 1:20 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 22:42, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 5/3/2024 11:15 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
In order to validate drm/msm register definition files against schema,
reuse the nodebugfs build step. The validation entry is guarded by
the EXPER
On Sat, 4 May 2024 at 01:38, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/3/2024 1:20 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 22:42, Abhinav Kumar
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/3/2024 11:15 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> In order to validate drm/msm register definition files against
On 5/3/2024 5:02 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 4 May 2024 at 01:38, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 5/3/2024 1:20 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 22:42, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 5/3/2024 11:15 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
In order to validate drm/msm register definiti
20 matches
Mail list logo
