Uwe Kleine-König writes:
Hello Uwe,
> Hello,
>
> this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm
> to use the .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove()
> callback .remove_new() returns no value. This is a good thing because
> the driver core doesn't (and c
Hi Doug,
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:08:15AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 8:40 AM Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:25:23PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm
> > > to use the .remove_
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 9:26 AM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> > The following ones appeared to apply to the top of drm-misc-next, but
> > I didn't apply them since get_maintainer didn't say they were part of
> > drm-misc-next:
> >
> > drm/tiny: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
On 08/06/2023 19:26, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Doug,
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:08:15AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 8:40 AM Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:25:23PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
this patch series adapts the platform drivers below dri
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 10:19 AM Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
>
> On 08/06/2023 19:26, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:08:15AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 8:40 AM Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >>> On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:25:23PM +0200
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 8:40 AM Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:25:23PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm
> > to use the .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove()
> > call
Hello,
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:25:23PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm
> to use the .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove()
> callback .remove_new() returns no value. This is a good thing because
> the dr
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 04:50:57PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2023년 5월 8일 (월) 오전 1:32, Uwe Kleine-König 님이
> 작성:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm
> > to use the .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove()
> > callba
Hi,
2023년 5월 8일 (월) 오전 1:32, Uwe Kleine-König 님이 작성:
>
> Hello,
>
> this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm
> to use the .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove()
> callback .remove_new() returns no value. This is a good thing because
First of all,
[A few addressed bounced and my script to find the recipents for a patch
series broke and invented some addresses. I fixed all the problem I'm
aware of in this mail.]
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:06:27AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> for the whole series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann
>
Hi,
for the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann
Please see my comment on the patches to tiny/.
Let me know if you want me to merge this patchset into drm-misc-next.
Best regards
Thomas
Am 07.05.23 um 18:25 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
Hello,
this patch series adapts the platform dri
Hello,
this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm
to use the .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove()
callback .remove_new() returns no value. This is a good thing because
the driver core doesn't (and cannot) cope for errors during remove. The
only eff
12 matches
Mail list logo
