On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 13:48, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 03:37:15AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 04/12/2023 10:38, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 12:07:49AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > The drm_atomic_helper_check_wb_encoder_state() funct
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 03:37:15AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 04/12/2023 10:38, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 12:07:49AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > The drm_atomic_helper_check_wb_encoder_state() function doesn't use
> > > encoder for anything other than getting
On 04/12/2023 10:38, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 12:07:49AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
The drm_atomic_helper_check_wb_encoder_state() function doesn't use
encoder for anything other than getting the drm_device instance. The
function's description talks about checking the wri
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 12:07:49AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The drm_atomic_helper_check_wb_encoder_state() function doesn't use
> encoder for anything other than getting the drm_device instance. The
> function's description talks about checking the writeback connector
> state, not the encod
The drm_atomic_helper_check_wb_encoder_state() function doesn't use
encoder for anything other than getting the drm_device instance. The
function's description talks about checking the writeback connector
state, not the encoder state. Moreover, there is no such thing as an
encoder state, encoders g
