On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:26:45PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 11:11, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:17:08AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 19:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > External email : Please d
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:27:14AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 10:24 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:17:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:09:05AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > > > Hi Maxime, Danie
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 11:11, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:17:08AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 19:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> > > you have verified the sender
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:17:08AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 19:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> > you have verified the sender or the content.
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:09:05AM +
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:17:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:09:05AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > Hi Maxime, Daniel,
> >
> > We encountered similar issue with mediatek SoCs.
> >
> > We have found that in drm_atomic_helper_commit_rpm(), when disabling
> > the
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:09:05AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> Hi Maxime, Daniel,
>
> We encountered similar issue with mediatek SoCs.
>
> We have found that in drm_atomic_helper_commit_rpm(), when disabling
> the cursor plane, the old_state->legacy_cursor_update in
> drm_atomic_wait_for_v
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:12:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> things.
>
> For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
> ->atomic_async_c
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:14 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:12 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> > out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> > things.
> >
> > For async updates we now h
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:12 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> things.
>
> For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
> ->atomic_async_check and ->at
The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
things.
For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
->atomic_async_check and ->atomic_async_commit hooks. Support for that
for msm and vc4 landed. n
13 matches
Mail list logo
