On 25/04/2024 11:01, Helen Koike wrote:
On 08/04/2024 14:04, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
Hi Helen
Gentle reminder on this.
If you are okay, we can land it via msm-next tree...
Thanks
Abhinav
On 4/1/2024 1:48 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
After IGT migrating to dynamic sub-tests, the pipe prefixes
On 08/04/2024 14:04, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
Hi Helen
Gentle reminder on this.
If you are okay, we can land it via msm-next tree...
Thanks
Abhinav
On 4/1/2024 1:48 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
After IGT migrating to dynamic sub-tests, the pipe prefixes
in the expected fails list are incorrect.
Hi Helen
Gentle reminder on this.
If you are okay, we can land it via msm-next tree...
Thanks
Abhinav
On 4/1/2024 1:48 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
After IGT migrating to dynamic sub-tests, the pipe prefixes
in the expected fails list are incorrect. Lets drop those
to accurately match the expect
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:48:58PM -0700, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> After IGT migrating to dynamic sub-tests, the pipe prefixes
> in the expected fails list are incorrect. Lets drop those
> to accurately match the expected fails.
>
> In addition, update the xfails list to match the current passing
>
After IGT migrating to dynamic sub-tests, the pipe prefixes
in the expected fails list are incorrect. Lets drop those
to accurately match the expected fails.
In addition, update the xfails list to match the current passing
list. This should have ideally failed in the CI run because some
tests were
