On 02/26/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
rebased patch against current ipa-2-2 branch
I'm seeing two test failures with patches 62, 63 and 64 applied:
==
ERROR: tests.test_ipaserver.test_rpcserver.t
On 02/26/2012 04:40 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 02/26/2012 03:54 PM, John Dennis wrote:
I assume you're running the script I attached. The reason why you keep
getting new sessions is because the script does not send the previous
cookie back, from the server's perspective the
John Dennis wrote:
rebased patch against current ipa-2-2 branch
I'm seeing two test failures with patches 62, 63 and 64 applied:
==
ERROR: tests.test_ipaserver.test_rpcserver.test_session.test_route
John Dennis wrote:
On 02/26/2012 03:54 PM, John Dennis wrote:
I assume you're running the script I attached. The reason why you keep
getting new sessions is because the script does not send the previous
cookie back, from the server's perspective these all appear to be new
login requests. Session
On 02/26/2012 03:54 PM, John Dennis wrote:
I assume you're running the script I attached. The reason why you keep
getting new sessions is because the script does not send the previous
cookie back, from the server's perspective these all appear to be new
login requests. Sessions are not tracked by
On 02/26/2012 03:38 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
This patch adds support for password based session login (see detailed
comments in patch)
Only the server side is implemented, someone will have to add password
based login to the UI, when they do they should update the unauthoriz
On 02/26/2012 03:08 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Can you explain this change?
-key = shift_path_info(environ)
+key = environ.get('PATH_INFO')
Sure, previously there was an expectation that every level in the URL
path would have it's own WSGI script. You would pop off the first
c
John Dennis wrote:
This patch adds support for password based session login (see detailed
comments in patch)
Only the server side is implemented, someone will have to add password
based login to the UI, when they do they should update the unauthorized
messges to include the new method, those mes
John Dennis wrote:
On 02/24/2012 09:45 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 02/23/2012 10:10 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
This works great, particularly with patch 63. The only thing I wasn't
able to test at all is logout. Is there a way to test that as-is or will
the UI guys need
Hi Krzysztof,
first thank you for bringing up the topic of wider use of FreeIPA on
different platforms.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
> Hey,
>
> tjaalton has pointed you as a most likely suspect for contacting
> regarding adding some support for Debian to the FreeIPA. We're b
This patch adds support for password based session login (see detailed
comments in patch)
Only the server side is implemented, someone will have to add password
based login to the UI, when they do they should update the unauthorized
messges to include the new method, those message occur in two pl
11 matches
Mail list logo
