On (04/03/16 16:48), Petr Spacek wrote:
>On 4.3.2016 15:05, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> On 3.3.2016 18:15, Martin Basti wrote:
On 03.03.2016 17:36, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 03:52 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> related
On 03/01/2016 01:37 PM, Pavel Vomacka wrote:
Hi,
The patch adds new field in user add dialog. This combo box lists GIDs
of posix groups
so user can choose one. It is also possible to fill a GID number
which is not in the list.
Link to the ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5505
Hello all,
COPR repostories for testing of upcoming 4.3.1 and 4.2.4 releases were
created in new @freeipa group:
* @freeipa/freeipa-4-2-rc for f23
* @freeipa/freeipa-4-3-rc for f23, f24, rawhide
@freeipa/freeipa-4-2-rc is undergoing pre-release testing. It also means
that there is push
* old messages have been removed *
1)
this method is unused please remove it
def test_kra_install_master(self):
Well, in fact it is used twice: in both domain levels, so I'd better
keep it:
-bash-4.3$ ipa-run-tests test_integration/test_replica_promotion.py
--collect-only
On 03/04/2016 03:59 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 4.3.2016 15:23, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 03:11 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
I've updated Feature template to make sure that important the design decisions
are recorded somewhere.
Of course all this is open for discussion. I did this
On 4.3.2016 15:05, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 3.3.2016 18:15, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03.03.2016 17:36, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 03/03/2016 03:52 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> related tickets:
>
On 03/04/2016 03:41 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 03:11 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
I've updated Feature template to make sure that important the design decisions
are recorded somewhere.
Of course all this is open for discussion. I did this soon because I believe
that it is better
Hi, Martin.
An updated version of the patch is attached. Please see my comments below
On 03/04/2016 08:39 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 04.03.2016 08:37, Martin Basti wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03.03.2016 18:38, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02.03.2016 13:47, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 4.3.2016 15:33, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 03/04/2016 03:11 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've updated Feature template to make sure that important the design
>> decisions
>> are recorded somewhere.
>>
>> Of course all this is open for discussion. I did this soon because I believe
>>
On 4.3.2016 15:23, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 03/04/2016 03:11 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've updated Feature template to make sure that important the design
>> decisions
>> are recorded somewhere.
>>
>> Of course all this is open for discussion. I did this soon because I believe
>>
On 03/04/2016 03:39 PM, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> Based on Alexander's suggestion I created a copr repo with latest
> python-icalendar version.
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stlaz/python-icalendar/packages/
Thanks. When we get to end-to-end functionality (again), it should again
On 03/04/2016 03:11 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've updated Feature template to make sure that important the design decisions
> are recorded somewhere.
>
> Of course all this is open for discussion. I did this soon because I believe
> that it is better to actually see how it looks like
Based on Alexander's suggestion I created a copr repo with latest
python-icalendar version.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stlaz/python-icalendar/packages/
On 03/04/2016 02:53 PM, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hello,
So in the previous month and a bit I was reworking the time-based
On 03/04/2016 03:11 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've updated Feature template to make sure that important the design decisions
> are recorded somewhere.
>
> Of course all this is open for discussion. I did this soon because I believe
> that it is better to actually see how it looks like
On 03/04/2016 03:11 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've updated Feature template to make sure that important the design decisions
> are recorded somewhere.
>
> Of course all this is open for discussion. I did this soon because I believe
> that it is better to actually see how it looks like
Hello,
I've updated Feature template to make sure that important the design decisions
are recorded somewhere.
Of course all this is open for discussion. I did this soon because I believe
that it is better to actually see how it looks like instead of discussing
vaporware. Wiki has revert button
On 03/04/2016 02:30 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 03/04/2016 01:09 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 12:59 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>
On 3.3.2016 08:59, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (01/03/16 14:35), Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 1.3.2016 12:06, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (25/02/16 15:57), Petr Spacek wrote:
On 19.2.2016 13:55, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Fix build with GCC 4.9+.
>
> GCC 4.9+ is too
Hello,
So in the previous month and a bit I was reworking the time-based
policies according to the changes we agreed on
(http://pad.engineering.redhat.com/ipa-time-based-HBAC-design, line 83).
Let me briefly walk you through what was done (no TLDR, sorry, but split
the text in chapters):
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 01:09 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 12:59 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 10:10 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016,
On 03/01/2016 03:46 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Pylint: enable parallelism
>
> The config file specifies 8 cores but Pylint very quickly
> ends up with 3 cores so do not worry about overwhelming your system.
I like the idea of the patch, however, on my single-CPU VM this causes
Niranjan wrote:
> Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > On 03/01/2016 05:18 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > > On 02/29/2016 05:57 PM, Niranjan wrote:
> > >> Greetings,
> > >>
> > >> Attached wrong patch in my last mail. Request to review the patch
> > >> attached to this email
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
On 03/04/2016 01:09 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 03/04/2016 12:59 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 10:10 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>
On 04.03.2016 09:48, David Kupka wrote:
This patch is going to master branch only. Works for me, ACK.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Basti"
To: "freeipa-devel"
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 5:33:18 PM
Subject: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH
On 03/02/2016 06:23 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 02.03.2016 17:17, Martin Basti wrote:
>> Patch attached, read commit message for more info.
>>
>>
> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5718
>
> Updated patch attached.
>
>
Good catch, ACK. Issue is present both in master and
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 12:59 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 10:10 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hi Alexander and others,
As you know, SSSD 1.13.4 added support of
On 03/04/2016 12:59 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 03/04/2016 10:10 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hi Alexander and others,
As you know, SSSD 1.13.4 added support of reading the native SUDO
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/04/2016 10:10 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hi Alexander and others,
As you know, SSSD 1.13.4 added support of reading the native SUDO tree [1].
This means that FreeIPA deployments with all clients being
On 03/04/2016 10:10 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> Hi Alexander and others,
>>
>> As you know, SSSD 1.13.4 added support of reading the native SUDO tree [1].
>> This means that FreeIPA deployments with all clients being SSSD 1.13.4 or
>> older
>> will
Hi,
this fixes incorrect usercertificate attribute docstrings in several IPA
objects.
Tomas
From a056b839c48363721d0c27a196e9b47bdd28f12a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomas Babej
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:45:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ipalib: Fix user certificate docstrings
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On the other hand, if no users are going to use the configuration, it
should not hurt anymore to have it enabled. With current slapi-nis state
there should be no problems anymore.
I
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On the other hand, if no users are going to use the configuration, it
> should not hurt anymore to have it enabled. With current slapi-nis state
> there should be no problems anymore.
I admit I haven't been following the
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hi Alexander and others,
As you know, SSSD 1.13.4 added support of reading the native SUDO tree [1].
This means that FreeIPA deployments with all clients being SSSD 1.13.4 or older
will be able to disable the sudoers schema compatiblity tree
This patch is going to master branch only. Works for me, ACK.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Basti"
To: "freeipa-devel"
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 5:33:18 PM
Subject: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 0430] remove unused argument from function
Hi Alexander and others,
As you know, SSSD 1.13.4 added support of reading the native SUDO tree [1].
This means that FreeIPA deployments with all clients being SSSD 1.13.4 or older
will be able to disable the sudoers schema compatiblity tree
(cn=sudoers,cn=Schema
On 3.3.2016 18:15, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 03.03.2016 17:36, Petr Vobornik wrote:
>> On 03/03/2016 03:52 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> related tickets:
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5676
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5675
>>>
36 matches
Mail list logo