On 10/23/2015 06:39 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/23/2015 11:24 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/23/2015 11:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/12/2015 01:17 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/12/2015 12:44 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 23.07.2015 10:46, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
The attached
On 07/20/2015 11:24 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Basti wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5086
Patch attached.
Is this going to be a shock on upgrades for people who until now may
be relying on the fact that there is no limit?
Just throwing my 2 cents in. The replication
On 07/20/2015 12:50 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 20/07/15 17:48, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 07/20/2015 05:24 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Basti wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5086
Patch attached.
Is this going to be a shock on upgrades for people who until now may be
.
Nathan, is it manageable before Christmas? One or either way? Is you
think that the downgrade is safe from data format perspective? (I
mean DB format upgrades etc.?)
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
___
Freeipa
agreements
Yeah, sorry not that familiar with winsync(didn't know it used the same
repl agmts). I will have to do another fix...
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
--
Mark Reynolds
-devel
--
Mark Reynolds
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/337
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/337/0001-Ticket-337-RFE-Improve-CLEANRUV-functionality.patch
Previously the steps to remove a replica and its RUV was problematic. I
created two new tasks to take care of the entire replication environment.
